MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7066218125

George Crawford fonds, 1813-1868, n.d.

2021· other· en· W7066218125 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2021
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeorge (robot)State (computer science)ThursdaySupperTourismBaton rouge
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Most of the fonds consists of correspondence written to George Crawford, a Pennsylvania State Legislator. The bulk of these letters were written to him while he was serving as a Pennsylvania State Legislator from 1831 to 1834. Other materials include rolls for labourers working on the Pennsylvania Canal, legal documents, accounts, printed material, receipts, and newspapers. Correspondence, 1817-1868, n.d. Contains 268 letters. Many of the letters are from constituents, fellow legislators, judges, and lawyers who were looking for Crawford’s support on their bills, need for a charter, petitions, remonstrances, or inquiries. An interesting letter to George Crawford from his son R.A. Crawford in 1857 provides a detailed description of his trip to Niagara Falls, including sightseeing excursions to Goat Island, the suspension bridge, Barnett’s Museum, and Lundy’s Lane. June Saturday 14th 1857 Father, I suppose you would like to hear from us concerning our journey. I suppose to give you a full history of our journey I must commence from the time we left home. We had a tolerable pleasant trip on packet to Williamsport. Rather cool arrived at Williamsport about eleven o’clock laid by until 3 after dinner and took the cars for Elmira arrived about ten at night took our supper went to bed, next morning started to the great Niagara, arrived at Niagara about eleven o’clock went over to Gote Island to view the falls. We saw a great many curiosities. Gote Island is heavily timbered and would be a beautiful place of retreat in the hot summer months, for those that have but little to do and plenty to spend. After viewing the falls, we left the Island for dinner, after dinner we was pestered by a fellow that wanted to haul us over the great and beautiful suspension bridge to view the falls from Canada side, at length he offered so cheap and agreeing to pay the toll we took him up at his bargain. He said he must have his pay before he started after collecting his money said that his brother should take us. So, we mounted the cab and off we went for the bridge arriving there the collector demanded his toll, the driver said we was to pay it we said the driver was to pay the toll, so we sat and argued about the matter and had some sport with the fellow. We told him that he should either take us back or pay the toll at length he paid and over we went to the fall. After viewing the falls, we went to see a museum they have there that is quite a curiosity. They have animals of different descriptions, birds and fish, snakes and a great many curiosities made by the Indians such as moccasins, bark canoes, powder horn, and a great many other things made by the squaws. After seeing the different things in the museum, we walked out into an adjoining lot to see the wolves and buffaloes. The buffaloes appeared to be very savage, after seeing the animals we mounted our seats and told the driver to drive us out to Lundy’s Lane battleground. At first he refused. Andrew told him to throw down the lines and he would drive himself, at length he drove us out there. They have a pair of winding stairs we walked up and took a view of the country and of the surrounding scenery. After viewing the beautiful farms for there is such there, we left for the bridge, took supper near the bridge with a dutchman, took the evening train for Detroit…”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,374
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,893

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3740,197

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,166
Écart entre enseignants0,147 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→Même sujetDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→Travaux en français237 207→