The Grand Entrance: A Faculty and Staff Housing Development
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The team chose this project because it is one of many upcoming projects detailed for California Polytechnic State University (University) in the 2035 Master plan. The University has a capacity of over 21,000 students and 3,000 employees, including 1,400 faculty. Many students and faculty from the University live within city limits, with students making up a majority of the rental market in the city. In a typical four-bedroom house, four students with four separate incomes can rent out a house together and pay a much higher rent than a faculty member with one to two incomes could. Additionally, The City of San Luis Obispo has reached a near-zero vacancy rate, with the average rent passing the average salary of a new University employee. As a result of this, many faculty members are forced to look for housing in the cities surround San Luis Obispo, creating longer and more inconvenient commutes. The University is aware of increasing difficulties for faculty to reside in the area and is seeking a design proposal for a faculty housing development on the corner of Slack St and Grand Ave. The Request for Proposals (RFP), issued in June 2022, outlined the need for 150-220 new rental and for sale units, with a variety of unit types and floor plans. This report serves as the deliverable for the University’s RFP, consisting of Site Analysis, Visioning, and Final Design. Over the course of Spring Quarter 2023, the team conducted several research methods, including in person site visits, existing building tours, and data collection from various news sources. We compiled this information into the first chapter of this report: SIte Context and Analysis. This chapter is organized into different types of data: Physical, Social, Regulatory, Cultural & Historical, and University. All data was summarized into the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) table and the Site Analysis Map. Next, the team took all the Site Analysis data and used it to create a vision for the project. We began by establishing design principals to guide our inspiration for the project. Once principals were established, the team conducted case studies based on housing projects in San Luis Obispo as well as other Universities. Pulling inspiration from these studies, we developed Goals, Principals, and Design Ideas for our project. Keeping these goals in mind, we began the design phase with two preliminary concept diagrams and final concept for the project. In the final few weeks of Spring Quarter, we began the Design Phase. Using SketchUp, Illustrator, and Photoshop, the team developed an illustrative site plan, a 3D model, and two perspective views of our final site. The Design chapter includes these deliverables as well as a project description and development table that connects our final design to the University’s RFP.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,055 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».