Internet-2 What is it and should you care?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Speakers John Houlker, Neil James, Simon Riley A coalition of USA 170 universities as well as research networks in Canada, EU and Australia plus a few dozen corporations have been pooling their resources to build the Internet 2 framework, which researchers are now using to develop a variety of futuristic, high-bandwidth applications. Internet 2 is built on a foundation of several networks capable of carrying data at dizzying speeds using connections up to 3 gigabits per second. For example, research teams at Stanford University are using Internet 2 to develop a variety of long-distance applications: a robotic helicopter that can be remotely controlled by spoken commands, a system for transmitting three-dimensional models of brain activity to remote locations, several videoconferencing courses involving students on multiple continents, and tools to allow surgeons to collaborate on operations happening thousands of miles away. Other applications are in the works, some of them commercial. A start up company called Teleportec has developed a broadband conferencing system that produces the illusion of a three-dimensional hologram, so you can use the Net to project a ghostly image of yourself, Princess Leia-like, onto a specially equipped lectern. The governor of Texas, Rick Perry, recently used the system to address a crowd in Dallas without ever leaving his office in Austin. Teleportec's system (which costs $70,000) is data-intensive, requiring 384 to 768 kbps of bandwidth, the Texas governor's address last month was transmitted over the Internet 2 network. Will Internet 2 supersede the current Internet? Not really. The purpose of Internet 2 is somewhat like that of the space program: to produce lots of indirect benefits by funding primary research. So rather than actually building the next version of the Internet, Internet 2 researchers hope to develop technologies and techniques that can later be applied to the public network by private enterprise and the government. Using examples like Teleportec the results will be truly amazing. There is a growing concern that New Zealand universities and research community are falling behind their international counterparts in access to high bandwidth data services that are needed to support Internet 2 One suggestion is for the establishment of a National Research and Education networking body which would collaborate with AARNet (the Australian Research and Education network) in the purchase of international data capacity in order to fully participate in the opportunities from Internet 2. This new body could represent New Zealand in international forums on research and education networking, enabling New Zealand to take place, in a peer relationship, in international initiatives such as the US Internet2 project. The lack of progress even at the discussion level here in New Zealand regarding the opportunities presented by Internet 2 when compared to Australia and Canada for example who have recently completed the first phase of Internet 2 networks does not bode well for the future, particularly in the context of progressing the notion of a "knowledge economy ". Limitations are for the most part not technical but rather the lack of the imagination.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,116 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».