Irish Health Services Accreditation Board annual report 1994
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I am delighted to present to you the Irish Health Services Accreditation Board's (IHSAB) Annual Report for 2004. The \nIHSAB leads and facilitates the development, assurance and continuous Improvement of quality structures in tile Irish \nhealth services. Our goal Is a safe and Quality-driven, person-centred journey through the health system. In light of this \nstrong mandate. I was delighted 10 be appointed Chairperson of the IHSAB in the first quarter of 2004. \n2004 saw many developments, including the appointment of Ms. Raisin Boland as the Board's first Chief Executive. \nMs Boland's experience in accreditation and in the health services as a whole has ensured that the IHSAB has continued \n10 deliver on its remit. \nThere is demonstrable evidence that the health services have embraced the concept of accreditation. By the end of \n2004, 80% of an acute care hospitals had voluntarily applied to participate in the scheme and this exceeded our \nprojected target of 60% for the year's end. Crucially, five hospitals that already underwent the survey process have \nreapplied to participate in the scheme and this reflects a significant level of buy-in from the acute care community. \nThe evolution of accreditation continues and the past year has seen many new initiatives and some significant milestones \nreached. We are particularly satisfied to be validated for the Acute Care Accreditation Scheme's (ACAS) 2nd Edition \nStandards by the International Accreditation Programme (lAP). In addition to this, the IHSAB will undergo organisational \naccreditallon with the lAP in the second half of 2005. Its the ACAS is three years in operation, the expansion of the \nscheme is timely. To this end, a phased approach to new scheme developments will be undertaken, commencing in late \n2005 with Palliative Care and Residential Services for Older People. \nThis is a time of major change within the health services and the IHSAB is a part of this reform programme. In 2006, its \nfunctions will be Integrated into the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). This development will provide the \nopportunity to expand our role and we look forward to affecting this prospect. \nThe Board is very aware of the rote that the IHSAB executive has played in the successful implementation of accreditation \nand it acknowledges their dedication and professionalism, which has ensured the achievement of so much in such a \nshort timeframe.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».