The Integration of Green Infrastructure and Equity within Urban Planning: An Academic and Applicative Exploration
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis examines the integration of green infrastructure and equity within academia and in practical applications such as comprehensive city plans. With climate change worsening and affecting urban areas with extreme weather events, many municipal governments are developing and implementing higher numbers of green infrastructure projects. However, cities need ensure that all residents are benefiting from green infrastructure otherwise those already at a risk of negative impacts from climate change may continue to be affected, or have those impacts exacerbated. \n \nThe goal of the first manuscript was to conduct a systematic literature review to explore 47 contemporary articles with the goal of identifying an overlap between equity and green infrastructure integration in urban planning. It is necessary to understand the integration, or lack thereof, of equity and green infrastructure in urban planning literature so that future research can fill in those missing considerations and build upon past work. Present research does indicate that green infrastructure and equity need to be considered in conjunction with one another so that the negative consequences of unconscious ignorance in planning is avoided. The second manuscript applies this research with the creation of a framework to evaluate Resilience Strategies – part of the “100 Resilient Cities” program by the Rockefeller Foundation, and comprehensive city plans, such as climate change adaptation plans. Eight plans were evaluated for four Canadian Cities: Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, and Montréal. \n \nMy research concludes that research in green infrastructure and equity is growing as most papers were published within the last 5 years (2015 – 2021), but further acknowledgement of various types of equity and intersectionality need to be considered in green infrastructure research. In addition, resilience strategies and comprehensive city plans were lacking in equity considerations in green infrastructure implementation. The scores for the eight plans in four Canadian cities assessed vary from 5 out of 25 to 15.5 out of 25. A standardized framework to help apply an equity lens for green infrastructure implementation can help ensure that there will be consistent necessary considerations for green infrastructure and equity in city planning. Comprehensive city plans and resilience strategies need to have equity considerations to ensure that the benefits of green infrastructure can reach all populations as needed, and to prevent the exacerbation of socioeconomic inequality. Altogether, improving the integration of equity and green infrastructure in cities can support climate change mitigation and adaptation for all residents and help to build a more sustainable future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».