Learning to Teach for Equity, Diversity, and Social Justice: A Mixed Methods Case Study of Initial Teacher Education in Ontario, Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Drawing on critical race theory, culturally and linguistically sustaining pedagogy, and ecological systems theory, this mixed methods case study explored the integration of equity, diversity, and social justice across one initial teacher education program in Ontario, Canada. Survey data (n=272) provided insight into prospective teachers’ endorsement of social-justice-related beliefs at program entry and exit. Demographic data were collected to obtain a current snapshot of initial teacher education representation rates, addressing a dearth of such data in the Ontario context. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with teacher candidates (n=15) and key stakeholders (n=4) to gain an understanding of how equity was conceptualized and operationalized (or not) within the program and how structures, policies, and practices enabled or constrained teacher candidates’ opportunities to learn about teaching for transformation.\nFindings revealed significant underrepresentation of Ontario’s broader racial, cultural, linguistic, and gender diversity, indicating a predominantly white, Canadian-born, cisgender, monolingual preservice cohort that stands in contrast to increasingly heterogeneous K-12 classrooms across the province. Results from the Learning to Teach for Social Justice-Beliefs scale (Ludlow et al., 2008) showed a stronger endorsement of social-justice-related beliefs by exiting teacher candidates than their entering counterparts, suggesting that impacting prospective teachers’ beliefs related to teaching for social justice can and should be a legitimate goal and targeted outcome of initial teacher education. Finally, participants reported varying experiences and levels of preparedness to orchestrate equity-centered practice. Program fragmentation, theory to practice gaps, a lack of purposeful practicum placement, and chronic underrepresentation emerged as significant constraints to the integration of a coherent and comprehensive vision for equity and diversity. Positive relationships, including those forged with peers and in-service teacher role models, emerged as enablers, as did prospective teachers’ individual agency and openness to new ways of thinking and doing.\nGiven the gaps in knowledge with regards to how emerging anti-racism and pro-diversity policy priorities are being implemented ‘on the ground’, teacher educators, administrators, and policymakers aiming to actualize their goals in concrete ways within initial teacher education programs can draw on this research for insight—to build on successes and find innovative and equity-focused ways to overcome persistent challenges.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle