Mothers' Experiences of Supportive and Critical Comments: An Application of the Self Discrepancy Theory
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mothers are expected to adhere to cultural standards of a good mother, many of which are unachievable. In Canada, these standards often align with intensive mothering ideology where women are expected to enjoy motherhood, put their child(ren) before themselves, and follow best mothering practices. Women who do not obey the standards of a “good mother” may experience criticism from the self and from others. The current study aimed to explore women’s experiences of supportive and critical comments regarding their maternal actions/decisions. Thirty (N = 30) Saskatchewan mothers were recruited to participate in one-on-one, semi-structured, recorded interviews regarding their experiences of perceived meeting or deviating from what it means to be a good mother. Interviews were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s 6-step reflexive thematic analysis and affective reactions were explored using Saldaña’s emotion coding technique. Following the analyses, the findings were contrasted to Higgins’ self-discrepancy. The findings suggested that the self-discrepancy theory was an appropriate framework for understanding how women’s self-concept may relate to their experiences of meeting or deviating from what it means to be a good mother. Dejected emotions were reported for discrepancies between the actual/self versus the ideal/own, while dejected and agitated emotions were reported for discrepancies between the actual/self versus the ideal/other, ought-to/self, and ought-to/other. Women reported that meeting other’s expectations of a good mother was important in their establishment of their maternal identity and in building confidence in their role; however, some women found it difficult to recognize their actions as aligning with their own expectations. While every woman reported experiencing critical comments from others, many women also reported that they were their own greatest source of criticism. Women were less inclined to share detailed accounts of supportive comments and even fewer accounts of meeting their own expectations. Lastly, women reported confidence and the decision to change their own expectations were important strategies to overcome criticism from others and the self. The findings have implications for understanding how to improve perceptions of the self for new and experienced mothers and theoretical implications for the self-discrepancy theory.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».