MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7068403935

Attended

2010· other· en· W7068403935 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueAUSpace (Athabasca University) · 2010
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRelevance (law)CertificationMarketing researchScope (computer science)Research designMarket researchTracking (education)Data collectionKey (lock)Research proposal
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Both courses are core requirements for obtaining the Certified Marketing Research Professional (CMRP) designation through the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association (MRIA). This Canadian designation is well sought after by research practitioners in the marketing research, program evaluation and institutional analysis industry.
\n
\nThe funding was used to claim expenses associated with course registrations and travel fees to and from the course venues. No papers were presented as this was not a conference.
\n
\nThis report provides an overview of the topic areas covered in the two courses and their relevance to my role as an Institutional Analyst with the Office of Institutional Studies.
\n2.0\tMarketing Research Design: An Applied Course
\n
\nThe Marketing Research Design course examined key research designs used in marketing research and provided criteria for choosing the ideal research design based on specific research needs. It quickly covered the key theoretical concepts and then focused on case studies. 
\n
\nThe major topics covered in this core course were:
\n
\n1.\tUnderstanding the need for marketing research
\n2.\tDefining the objectives of the research
\n3.\tResearch Designs
\nExploratory, conclusive, and tracking research
\nCross-sectional and latitudinal design
\nSecondary and primary research
\nTools of data collection
\n4.\tSelecting the research design and data collection tools
\n5.\tElements of a research plan/proposal
\n6.\tCosting issues related to different research designs
\n
\nCourse Relevance 
\n
\nThe course was fairly broad and introductory in scope which is in line with its positioning as a required core course. In a sense, it was a good confirmation and refresher of my existing knowledge and an eye opener to other research design areas that I have not utilized frequently in my career. 
\n
\nResearch design is an integral part of my role as an institutional analyst with the Office of Institutional Studies. We serve a wide client base across the university. As such, our clients’ research needs are many and varied, and each need requires a tailored research approach/design based on key objectives. For example, many of the program reviews we undertake have a qualitative component such as telephone, online or paper based surveys and qualitative component such as moderating focus groups or conducting key informant interviews. All of these research methods were discussed at length and case studies were presented to provide different real life scenarios which call for different research designs. Samples of data collection tools, such as sample surveys or focus group moderator’s guide, were also presented.
\n
\nThe topic areas covering latitudinal design have implications for research on the effectiveness of advertising. For example, measuring awareness of Athabasca University among a population and then holding an advertising campaign after which the level of awareness is measured among the same population to identify advertising impact. The Office of Institutional Studies has been exploring such latitudinal approaches in measuring advertising effectiveness and this course was a valuable informer of best practices for this approach.
\n3.0\tQualitative Marketing Research
\n
\nThe Qualitative Marketing Research course examined the theory and application of some of the most frequently used qualitative research techniques and it considered the key criteria used in selecting a qualitative research design. It provided an overview on budgeting for and using qualitative research for advertising, idea generation, product development and customer/employee satisfaction.
\n
\nThe major topics covered in this core course were:
\n
\n1.\tFocus groups, dyads, triads and in-depth interviews
\n2.\tDeveloping discussion guides
\n3.\tUsing and selecting the best research design
\n4.\tCosting qualitative research
\n5.\tMaking the right demands of recruiters
\n6.\tListening and observing for maximum benefit
\n7.\tTranslating qualitative research into actionable reports
\n8.\tNew and innovative moderating and projective techniques
\n
\n
\nCourse Relevance 
\n
\nAs an Instititutional Analyst with the Office of Institutional Studies I planned three usability testing focus group sessions at Athabasca University Central, the Edmonton Learning Centre, and the Calgary Learning Centre. The purpose of the sessions was to solicit staff feedback on a new staff portal to be modeled after the myAU portal for students. As such, I designed the sample distribution of participants in the three geographies based on job titles, designed recruitment screeners to invite focus group participants and supervised the recruitment activities undertaken at the Office of Institutional Studies. I also designed the focus group moderator’s guide and facilitated the focus group discussions. 
\n
\nIn light of future focus groups which are anticipated to be undertaken by our office, my attendance at the Qualitative Marketing Research course was extremely relevant. The course explored various focus group setups such as one on one interviews, dyads (holding a focus group with two participants), and triads (holding a focus group with three participants). Holding a series of triads as opposed to a single big focus group was recommended for future usability testing to allow for more depth in engaging with participants, an approach that could be adopted at a future focus group being planned at the Centre for Innovative Management.
\n
\nThe course also explored projective techniques such as “personification” to engage participants who have difficulty in describing a product or a service. For example, a participant could be asked: “If this product was a person, what type of a person would it be?” The cited attributes for the person would then be projected back onto the product. This technique could have wide applications at Athabasca University to open up respondents who are either introverted or have difficulty expressing their views on certain products or services under evaluation.
\n
\nThere was also a discussion on recruitment screeners. Various examples were cited based on various combinations of demographics and psychographics depending on research design, again an eye opener to future focus group recruitments at Athabasca University.
\n
\nAll in all, this course was very relevant to my position and equipped me with new knowledge that could be applied to future qualitative research projects designed and managed by the Office of Institutional Studies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0230,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,192
Écart entre enseignants0,185 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAUSpace (Athabasca University)Même sujetWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisTravaux en français237 207