Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In these files, there have been numerous photographs showing ships engaged in the fishing trade, \nthe salmon trade, and the lumber trade. The last days of commercial sail were filled with three \nproblems that grew to overwhelming proportions: a labor problem, a paying freight problem \n(how does the ship pay its way?), and the biggest problem of them all—competition from more \nefficient systems, whether rail or powered ship. When compound steam engines became the \nnorm, rather than the exception, commercial sail could no longer compete with known arrival \nschedules and rapid turn-around time. Instead, sail could compete best with bulk cargoes where \nfree warehousing (several months in the hold of a sailing ship) was the norm. From the 1880s \nthrough the 1920s, another persistent challenge was to find a crew with a skill set commensurate \nwith the rigors of a large sailing vessel. The smart able-bodied sailors opted for the easier life in \nsteam. While there was no want of capable officers, the lack of competent sailors became \ncritical well before 1900. In a brief article I read from the San Francisco Call Bulletin around \nthe turn of the century, there was a brief newsy note about a well-known master of a big 4- \nmasted bark that was “day sailing” around the Bay trying to get his newly-hired (shanghaied?) \ncrew into some sort of sail-drill shape before venturing forth on a voyage. While that kind of \ntraining is laudable, it is also revealing of the lack of sailing fundamentals available wharfside in \nlatter-day sail. \nWhat were the cargoes available to sail in its latter days? Photograph 106a, a colored postcard, \nis illustrative. Front and center is a French-built bark at the coal wharves in San Francisco south \nof Market Street. Sailing ships routinely carried coal up and down the west coast and across the \nPacific and it was a paying “retirement” trade for older sailing vessels. The historic clipper \nDashing Wave was a particularly fetching coal tramp in its latter days and there are several \nphotographs of this clipper in and around San Francisco hauling coal long after the glory days. \nIronic that sailing ships carried the fuel that nourished the boilers of steam engines that were \nputting the windships out of business. However, such was the reality. \nGrain was another bulk cargo, and odd as it may seem now, California was once a world \nbreadbasket for grains of several kinds. Wooden ships carried the wheat through the 1870s and \n1880s back to the east coast. Starting in the 1870s, European (primarily British, but not \nexclusively so) sailing ships loaded wheat for Europe and by the end of the 1880s dominated the \ntrade. \nPhotographs 106b and 106c are of another boom bulk cargo that lasted well into the twentieth \ncentury and still prevails—lumber. Photograph 106b shows Port Blakely, Washington, awash in \nlarge latter-day sailing ships loading finished lumber for ports all around the world. The Hall \nBrothers maintained an important shipyard co-located with Port Blakely. Sailing ships hauled \nfinished and semi-finished lumber to Hawaii, Australia, and all over the Pacific. The streams of \nlumber ships after the 1906 earthquake and fire were prodigious. Photograph 106c (taken 26 \nJuly 1910) reveals, even though faded, large sailing ships (and a steamer to the right) loading \nlumber from the Hastings Mill at Vancouver, British Columbia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,057 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle