Optometry Outreach in Indigenous Communities in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Inuit, Métis, and First Nations, the three main Indigenous groups within Canada, face disproportionate barriers to access for primary eye and vision care. Optometrists visit rural and remote Indigenous communities to provide outreach care to areas without a local optometrist; however, the approach is fragmented and not well represented. The purpose of this project is to assess the current state of outreach optometry within Indigenous communities by surveying optometrists who provide outreach care. \n \n \nMethods: In collaboration with the provincial optometry regulatory bodies, eligible participants were identified as optometrists who travel outside of their primary clinics to provide care within non-urban Indigenous communities. A questionnaire was developed through iterative stakeholder review for phase I of the study. The online questionnaire captured the delivery of care across one year (2022). The process of planning logistics, distances travelled, patient care provided and associated expenses were queried. A Semi-structured interview guide was developed for phase II of the study. One-on-one interviews expanded on questionnaire themes, providing insight into individual experiences. Data was collated through descriptive statistics and thematic coding for case and cross-case analysis. \n \n \nResults: The overall response rate was 50% (18/36) for the questionnaire and 30.5% (11/36) for the interview. Total questionnaire responses represent 96 outreach visits, 312.5 optometry clinic days, and 8,386 patient encounters across 64 communities in the three provinces. Optometrists coordinate with health center employees and school contacts to plan outreach visits, travelling primarily north to some of the most remote areas within each province. Overall Euclidean distances between participants primary clinic locations and communities visited ranged from 65 to 1405 kilometers (kms) (median: 438 kms). Costs per clinic day were highly variable ($174.44 - $3,800, mean: $765 per clinic day). Challenges reported were related to logistics, economic burden, and organizational challenges. Complementary enablers were identified, and recommendations are provided. \n \n \nConclusions: This study is the first to provide visibility to the current state of outreach optometry care to Indigenous communities in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. The process of planning outreach visits was variable for individual optometrists and between provinces. High variability in reported costs associated with outreach visits requires additional investigation. Multi-stakeholder collaboration to support optometry outreach programming would encourage outreach participation and improve services towards reducing eye and vision health inequity experienced by non-urban Indigenous populations. \n \n \nAcknowledgements: Project supported by Anonymous Philanthropic Foundation, Canadian Institute for Health Research Canadian Graduate Scholarship, and Canadian Optometric Education Trust Fund. No conflicts to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».