MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7070232520

Ny Nordisk Skole

2013· other· en· W7070232520 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) · 2013
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDanishJoin (topology)Christian ministryInstitutionPoint (geometry)Continuing education
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This master asks the question whether New Nordic School is an indication on that there is a new management paradigm on the way to the public school? New Nordic School is a two-year development project which is developed and launched by the Child and Education Minister Christine Antorini in the spring of 2012. The Minis-ter's starting point has been that too few young people complete a youth (upper sec-ondary) education in Denmark, and her suggestion for a solution to the problem is de-scribed in New Nordic School, which focuses on children and youth’s learning from 0-18 years. The project identifies the professional teachers and educators as agents of change. The Minister expresses that the school can only be changed from within, and she invites all professionals to join the project. It is voluntarily to join the project, but there is a re-quirement that the individual institution is in consensus about the connection, and the requirement of working in networks across institutions. The study is based on data material downloaded from the website of the Ministry of Youth and Education and is also based on interviews with key people in the project. Our study is divided into three sub-analyzes: The first sub-analysis deals with hedging New Nordic School as a phenomenon. Here we show how New Nordic Schools draw on both the Nordic and the Danish school tradition, but also how it draws on inspiration from Ontario in Canada. At the same time, we try to identify what is the "new" in New Nordic School. The conclusion of this part can be summarized as follows: New Nordic School lacks concretization, and the consequence is that right now that the project has many meanings added to it. The described sources of inspiration are several places only used in extracts, in which they are taken out of con-text and reused in another in order to create legitimacy for the project, but with the possible outcome that the chosen approaches do not lead to the desired target. The second sub-analysis is dealing with New Nordic School in a paradigm context. Based in Leon Lerborgs paradigm theory, it is here shown how New Nordic School can be un-derstood in a paradigm context. The conclusion of this part says that New Nordic School is a new management approach in primary and lower secondary school, but also that this new approach leans against a professional paradigm. At the same time coupled with new management approaches, where the clear focus on achieving the common objectives are inspired by NPM, but also foster new innovative approaches in the elementary school. The third sub-analysis is dealing with the management task of extending the connection to New Nordic School. We show that the project does not contain a real management point of view, but the respondent leaders perceive New Nordic School as an opportunity and a legitimization of new approaches in management. We conclude, that New Nordic School will require new management approaches and that the project do not contain adequately focus on management efforts, but also that in the municipal management context marked by NPM-control measures, can be strengthened by the cross-pressures that leaders must make within New Nordic School . The Master concludes that New Nordic School cannot currently be taken as an indication that a new management paradigm is on its way. But it can be perceived as something qualitatively new, where we see both a rearticulating of a professional management paradigm but also a qualitative change, which adds a common focus on goal setting and an approach to innovation. The Master describes this movement as a shift of the known paradigms, and in this way concludes that New Nordic School pushes the dominant management paradigms in the school area.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2540,068

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,318 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)Même sujetLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesTravaux en français237 207