MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7070383742

A parasitological study of the red fox (vulpes vulpes) with a citizen science approach for describing red foxes on Prince Edward Island, Canada

2018· article· en· W7070383742 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueIslandScholar (University of Prince Edward Island) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Mots-clésHabitatCitizen scienceDistribution (mathematics)WildlifeRural area
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has been described as the widest distributed member of the Order Carnivora and is capable of inhabiting both natural and human-altered (urban or rural) areas. In the Canadian province of Prince Edward Island (PEI), red foxes are found in natural, rural and urban areas. Since red foxes are found in many areas of PEI, the citizens could benefit from a better understanding of the consequences of living in close proximity with foxes. To accomplish this, studies that encompass all aspects of fox biology are necessary. In the studies featured in this thesis, the main objectives were to survey the parasites infecting the red fox in both urban and rural settings. These studies were done to determine if the urban habitat change has influenced the parasite burden. Additionally, these studies attempted to determine what kind of parasites they are shedding into the urban environment as it can influence exposure to pets and humans.\nThe distribution of red foxes on PEI was an aspect of their ecology that was in need of study. The first chapter in this thesis aimed to determine if crowd-sourced data on red fox sightings could be used to document the presence and characteristics of red foxes in smaller urban environments (Charlottetown and Stratford, PEI). From September 20, 2012 to May 31, 2014, the public was requested to record sightings of red foxes on a website (www.upei.ca/redfox). During the study period, recorded sighting numbers increased every year with a total of 2670 red fox sightings on PEI – 2040 of those sightings were recorded in the Charlottetown/Stratford areas. Foxes were present throughout the Charlottetown/Stratford areas and were sighted in many other areas across PEI. The methodology used in this study was able to portray the annual breeding patterns by showing a significant increase in sighting proportions with a young/juvenile fox during the late spring to late summer months. Low recruitment and retention of participants in months without a media appearance was a challenge this study faced. This study illustrated that citizen science data can be used to document the presence of foxes in urban areas; but, the approach is less effective when trying to document the presence of foxes in rural areas.\nThere have been no previous studies on PEI that address the parasites infecting the urban red fox population. From July 2, 2013 to August 20, 2014, a scat survey in Charlottetown and surrounding areas was completed to establish the species of parasites and prevalence by use of both the ZnSO4 centrifugal fecal flotation and modified Baermann technique. During the study period, a total of 263 red fox fecal samples were collected. A total of 21 parasites were detected - thirteen red fox parasites, two potentially spurious and six spurious parasites were found with individual prevalence ranging from 0.3% to 47.5%. Condition of scat and time of year had significant effects on the number of different parasites and/or prevalence of some parasites (p < 0.05). Both significant spatial and spatial-temporal correlations were found for Alaria sp., anoplocephalid, Aonchotheca putorii, Crenosoma vulpis, Cystoisospora canis, Demodex sp., Eimeria sp., and Monocystis sp. (p < 0.05). From this study, the foxes residing in Charlottetown and Stratford were found to be frequently parasitized and is likely to increase parasite exposure to dogs and humans through environmental contamination.\nPrevious studies that surveyed red fox parasites in rural PEI were only done during the trapping/hunting season (November – January) and were narrowly-focused (i.e. only examined a single parasite) and/or used only the fecal flotation technique. Therefore, to better establish the parasites infecting the red fox in rural areas and estimate their prevalence and intensity, parasite recovery techniques during post mortem of red fox carcasses from different sources (hunters, trappers, road kill) were completed. Between 2012 and 2015, 113 trapped red foxes and 16 urban road-killed foxes from central-eastern PEI were searched for parasites. Intestinal flushes, lung flushes, and fecal analyses were performed on all possible animals. Seven different intestinal parasite species and two respiratory parasite species were found in the red foxes on PEI with infection prevalence ranging from 13.2% to 86.5%. This study represents the first record of Himasthla sp. and Stephanoprora sp. infecting red foxes on PEI. Significant spatial and spatial-temporal clusters were also found for Alaria alata and echinostome flukes. Additionally, the sensitivity of the fecal flotation technique was found to range from 20.6% (Cryptocotyle lingua) to 62.5% (Alaria alata). This study has produced a baseline for parasitic infections in red foxes on PEI for the central and eastern parts of the island. Future survey work should be completed regularly to detect new parasites that have entered into the environment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,042
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,085

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIslandScholar (University of Prince Edward Island)Même sujetDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesTravaux en français237 207