MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7070784993

Point Cloud-based Deep Learning and UAV Path Planning for Surface Defect Detection of Concrete Bridges

2022· dissertation· en· W7070784993 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoint cloudSegmentationDeep learningBridge (graph theory)LidarPoint (geometry)Focus (optics)Image segmentationVisual inspection
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the past decades, several bridges have collapsed, causing many losses due to the lack of proper monitoring and inspection. Although several new techniques have been developed to detect bridge defects, annual visual inspection remains the main approach. Visual inspection, using naked eyes, is time-consuming and subjective because of human errors. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) scanning is a new technology to collect 3D point clouds. The main strength of point clouds over 2D images is collecting the third dimension of the scanned objects. Deep Learning (DL)-based methods have attracted the researchers’ attention for concrete surface defect detection. However, no point cloud-based DL method is currently available for semantic segmentation of bridge surface defects without converting the raw point cloud dataset into other representations, which results in increasing the size of the dataset and leads to some challenges regarding storage capacity, cost, and training time. Some promising point cloud-based semantic segmentation methods (i.e., PointNet and PointNet++) have been applied in segmenting bridge components (i.e., slabs, piers), but not for segmenting surface defects (i.e., cracks, spalls). Moreover, most of the current point cloud-based concrete surface defect detection methods focus on only one type of defects. On the other hand, in DL, a dataset plays a key role in terms of variety, diversity, accuracy, and size. The lack of publicly available point cloud datasets for bridge surface defects is one of the reasons of the lack of studies in the area of point cloud-based methods.
\nFurthermore, compared with terrestrial LiDAR scanning, LiDAR-equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is capable of scanning the inaccessible surfaces of the bridges at a closer distance with higher safety. Although the UAV flying path can be controlled using remote controllers, automating and optimizing UAV path planning is preferable for being able to trace a collision-free path with minimum flight time. To increase the efficiency and accuracy of this approach, it is crucial to scan all parts of the bridge with a near perpendicular view. However, in the case of obstacle existence (e.g., bridge piers), achieving full coverage with near perpendicular view may not be possible. To provide more accurate results, using overlapping views is recommended. However, this method could result in increasing the inspection cost and time. Therefore, overlapping views should be considered only for surface areas where defects are expected.
\nAddressing the above issues, this research aims to: (1) create a publicly available point cloud dataset for concrete bridge surface defect semantic segmentation, (2) develop a point cloud-based semantic segmentation DL method to detect different types of concrete surface defects, and (3) propose a novel near-optimal path planning method for LiDAR-equipped UAV with respect to the minimum path length and maximum coverage considering the potential locations of defects.
\nOn this premise, a point cloud-based DL method for semantic segmentation of concrete bridge surface defects (i.e., cracks and spalls), called SNEPointNet++, is developed. To have a network with high-performance, SNEPointNet++ focuses on two main characteristics related to surface defects (i.e., normal vector and depth) and takes into account the issues related to the point cloud dataset (i.e., small size and imbalanced dataset). Sensitivity analysis is applied to capture the best combination of hyperparameters and investigate their effects on network performance. The dataset, which was collected from four concrete bridges, was annotated, augmented, and classified into three classes: cracks, spalls, and no defect. This dataset is made available for other researchers. The model was trained and evaluated using 60% and 20% of the dataset, respectively. Testing on the remaining part of the dataset resulted in 93% recall (69% IoU) and 92% recall (82.5% IoU) for cracks and spalls, respectively. Moreover, the results show that the spalls of the segments deeper than 7 cm (severe spalls) can be detected with 99% recall. 
\nOn the other hand, this research proposes a 3D path planning method for using a UAV equipped with a LiDAR for bridge inspection to have efficient data collection. The method integrates a Genetic Algorithm (GA) and A* algorithm to solve the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), considering the potential locations of bridge surface defects such as cracks. The objective is to minimize the time of flight while achieving maximum visibility. The method provides the potential locations of surface defects to efficiently achieve perpendicular and overlapping views for sampling the viewpoints. Calculating the visibility with respect to the level of criticality leads to giving the priority to covering the areas with higher risk levels. Applying the proposed method on a 3-span bridge in Alberta, the results reveal that considering overlapping views based on the level of criticality of the zones and perpendicular views for all viewpoints leads to accurate and time-efficient data collection.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,068
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Même sujetInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringTravaux en français237 207