MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7070925342

Practical Aspects of Ammonia Water as Secondary Refrigerant in Ice Rinks

2021· dissertation· en· W7070925342 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · 2021
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueConservation Techniques and Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAmmoniaRefrigerantEvaporationRefrigerationFlash evaporationAmmonia production
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The transition from fluorinated gases to natural refrigerants could be key to reducing the impacts of climate change. Ice rinks are energy-intensive buildings, with large heating and cooling demands. The pumping power required to move the secondary refrigerant typically accounts for a sizable amount of the energy use of the refrigeration system. The use of aqua ammonia as a secondary fluid shows promising results, with pumping power use of about half that required of ethylene glycol, environmental friendliness, and low corrosivity to steel components. Aqua ammonia is still novel but is currently in use in 34 Swedish ice rinks. This thesis addresses questions regarding evaporation rates, performance, material compatibility, safety, and regulations of aqua ammonia in ice rink systems. Laboratory tests were performed to assess aqua ammonia evaporation rates during storage and operations. Long-duration concentration change, in well-sealed and well-stored containers, indicated low levels of evaporation for all tested concentrations samples. Short-term concentration in open-air conditions, indicated rapid rates of evaporation, with nearly full evaporation of all ammonia concentration occurring within only 90 seconds of open-air exposure. Testing of sample-mixtures containing contamination by substances aqua ammonia was likely to encounter during retrofit replacement situations determined that aqua ammonia and calcium chloride produce flakey sedimentation. Additionally, lower concentrations of aqua ammonia are slightly more prone to becoming basic when mixed with the tested substances, such as calcium chloride. Historical data of systems operating with aqua ammonia were analyzed for energy performance. While pumping requirements typically account for 10-20% of the energy for refrigeration, the pumps of the rinks studied with aqua ammonia accounted for only 1.2 to 4.2%. However, data availability and system configuration anomalies suggest additional analyses are required. Furthermore, best operating, maintenance, and safety practices were analyzed and global regulatory restrictions were examined. Surveying of manufacturer material compatibility information found copper and brass to be incompatible with aqua ammonia, while steel and carbon steel are recommended. Various plastics were addressed by the manufacturers, notably PVC was found to be acceptable for use with aqua ammonia. A cost comparison between aqua ammonia and calcium chloride found aqua ammonia to require less expensive equipment. Finally, aqua ammonia was determined to fall outside of the classification of refrigerants in several international refrigeration codes. Various additional safety regulations guiding personal protective equipment, exposure times, transportation, storage, and disposal regulations were catalogued as part of this work. In summary, aqua ammonia was found to be a safe substance with performance that matches theoretical energy savings. Pumping requirements were reduced from 10-20% to approximately 1-5% of overall refrigeration system energy use. Necessary safety precautions were found to be much less stringent than high concentrations of ammonia and aqua ammonia was ascertained to fall outside of refrigeration codes in Europe, Canada, and the United States of America

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,960
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)Même sujetConservation Techniques and StudiesTravaux en français237 207