The shifting terrain of feminist theory and activism : university-based women's centres and third wave feminism
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis, based on the results of an organizational ethnography of a university-based \nfeminist organization in Southern Ontario (the Centre), traces how third wave feminism \nis being constituted in the goals, initiatives, mandate, organizational structure, and overall \nculture of university-based feminist organizations. I argue that, from its inception, the \nmeanings and goals of the Centre have been contested through internal critique, \nreflection, and discussion inspired by significant shifts in feminist theory that challenge \nthe fundamental principles of second wave feminism. \nI identify a major shift in the development and direction of the Centre that occurs in two \ndistinct phases. The first phase of the shift occurs with the emergence of an antioppression \nframework, which broadens the Centre's mandate beyond gender and sexism \nto consider multiple axes of identity and oppression that affect women's lives. The \nsecond phase of this shift is characterized by a focus on (trans) inclusion and accessibility \nand has involved changing the Centre's name so that it is no longer identified as a \nwomen's centre in order to reflect more accurately its focus on mUltiple axes of identity \nand oppression. \nAlong with identifying two phases of a major shift in the direction of the Centre, I trace \ntwo discourses about its development. The dominant discourse of the Centre's \ndevelopment is one of progress and evolution. The dominant discourse characterizes the \nCentre as a dynamic feminist organization that consistently strives to be more inclusive \nand diverse. The reverse discourse undermines the dominant discourse by emphasizing \nthat, despite the Centre's official attempts to be inclusive and to build diversity, little has \nactually changed, leaving women of colour marginalized in the Centre's dominant culture \nof whiteness. \nThis research reveals that, while many of their strategies have unintended (negative) \nconsequences, members of the Centre are working to build an inclusive politics of \nresistance that avoids the mistakes of earlier feminist movements and organizations. \nThese members, along with other activists, actively constitute third wave feminism in a \nprocess that is challenging, contradictory, and often painful. A critical analysis of this \nprocess and the strategies it involves provides an opportunity for activists to reflect on \ntheir experiences and develop new strategies in an effort to further struggles for social \njustice and equity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».