Second language speakers’ attitudes towards the Québec French variety: An exploration of urban and rural Hispanic speakers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The province of Québec has been the scene of great political and linguistic changes in the past 60 years. These changes have often challenged Québec residents to reassess their existing or to develop new attitudes towards language and language use, and towards various ethnolinguistic groups, including French- and English-speaking communities. Despite its status as the sole official language of Québec, French—and more specifically the Québec French (QF) variety—has frequently been relegated to a lower status in favor of the Parisian “norm,” which is usually referred to as French from France (FF). Designated as the target variety for Radio-Canada newscasters, FF is also often adopted by teachers of French as a second language (L2) in Québec’s classrooms. It is little surprise, therefore, that L2 speakers of French tend to give negative evaluations to speakers of QF while not being able to reliably distinguish between the two varieties. However, far less is known about L2 speakers’ attitudes towards the QF variety specifically, and the French variety that they would like to learn and use. There is also a lack of research examining the effects of L2 speakers’ attitudes on their production of QF speech patterns, in relation to their sense of belonging towards the majority (francophone) community. But most importantly, there is a need to investigate the attitudes that L2 speakers living outside urban centres hold towards the QF variety and its speakers, and to examine whether these attitudes change, particularly in contexts where L2 speakers such as foreign temporary workers—an essential labour force representing more than 12,000 Latin Americans yearly—are geographically and socially isolated. With a better understanding of these issues, it would be possible to create practical recommendations for L2 French teachers as well as employers and professionals in charge of hiring foreign workers. With these broad goals in mind, this doctoral dissertation includes three studies, all carried out from a sociolinguistic perspective. Study 1 investigated L2 French speakers’ attitudes towards the QF speech variety as a function of their participation in the francisation (French-language instruction) program. Fifty-eight adult L2 French speakers listened to short sentences that either included or did not include QF speech patterns, rating these sentences for pleasantness, extent of their exposure to these and similar pronunciation patterns, and their preference to choose these patterns as a pronunciation model to follow. Focusing on the same 58 L2 French speakers, Study 2 examined the links between these speakers’ acculturation towards their home culture and the Québec culture and their preference for and their production of QF speech features, separately for those with and without experience in the francisation program. Finally, Study 3 targeted a group of 12 Guatemalan temporary workers living in rural areas, investigating longitudinally their attitudes and motivations towards learning and using L2 French, with qualitative analyses conducted to determine whether there was a change in the workers’ language use, attitudes, and motivation levels throughout their work experience in a French-speaking environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».