The Uncertainty Model of Boredom and Self-Control Failure: How Ambient Uncertainty Influences Affect and Behaviour during Unrelated Goal Pursuit
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Integrating basic theories of motivation, boredom and self-regulation, in this dissertation, I present the Uncertainty Model of Boredom and Self-Control Failure (UM-B-SCF). The UM-B-SCF proposes that motivational states elicited in one context can influence affect and behaviour during subsequent unrelated goal pursuit. Motivational theory guiding my work suggests that under conditions of goal conflict and uncertainty, the behavioural inhibition system (BIS) is activated causing generalized shifts in cognition, affect and behaviour, which persist until the conflict can be resolved (Corr & McNaughton, 2008; Gray & McNaughton, 2000). According to the UM-B-SCF, the resulting motivational state is conducive to feelings of boredom and self-control failure. Importantly, if uncertainties persist unresolved, the ambient motivational state can carry forward to cause boredom and low self-control in other goals unrelated to the initial conflict. Across seven studies (N = 1,972), I found consistent support for the proposed model. People who experienced greater uncertainty, whether due to awareness of death (Studies 2 and 3), the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic (Studies 4 and 5), an uncertain personal relationship (Study 7), or general life circumstances (Studies 1 and 6) perceived unrelated tasks and projects as more boring and difficult to complete. Felt uncertainty about an initial conflict predicted both experiencing (Studies 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6) and anticipating (Studies 2, 3, 5, and 7) more boredom and less self-control in general (Study 1), during a data entry task (Studies 2 and 3), working on daily tasks (Study 4), completing an online survey (Studies 4 and 7), imagining pursuing general (Study 5) and academic or career-related personal projects (Studies 2 and 3), and working toward general (Study 4) and specific academic goals (Study 6) over the course of a month. In Study 6, I assessed between- and within-person variability in uncertainty and found that experiencing more uncertainty on average and feeling more uncertain than usual were both associated with boredom and difficulties exercising self-control. In all seven studies, the results were consistent with an indirect pathway such that uncertainty predicted greater boredom, and boredom in turn predicted less self-control. Collectively, the results of the present research suggest that ambient uncertainty may be an inconspicuous but influential barrier to effective goal pursuit. Findings are discussed with respect to their implications for understanding the proposed theoretical process, including possible alternative conceptualizations of the model. Possible applications of the findings for alleviating boredom and disengagement are also discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».