A study of Manitoba principals' experiences of workplace mistreatment, its frequency, its severity and its impacts
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Canada and in many jurisdictions, the job of principals has been described as complex (Combs, Edmonson & Jackson, 2009; Duke, 1988; Pollock & Ryan, 2013). With such a task, levels of stress and job dissatisfaction could affect the ability of principals to fulfill all job requirements (Keashly, 1997; Raver & Nishii, 2010). One such stressor on a principal could be elements associated with mistreatment by other adults in the principals’ workplace network. There are no studies in the academic research to date that touch specifically on the types of general workplace mistreatment (Price Spratlen, 1995) that the principals suffer or the impacts that these incidents have on the principals. The purpose of this research was to contribute to the filling of this void by examining what twelve middle years school principals in Manitoba perceived as mistreatment from adults, the attributes of the mistreatment incidents regarding alleged perpetrators, frequency and severity of the incidents and the impacts on principals, particularly regarding well-being and job satisfaction. This exploratory study used mixed methods inquiry (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011) focusing on uncovering both quantitative data regarding the principals’ perception of the frequency and severity of the mistreatments, as well as qualitative data regarding the ways that principals constructed understandings of mistreatment and its impact. A heuristic framework was used to catalogue the perceptions of workplace mistreatment provided by the principals using classifications drawn from the organizational behaviour literature, Namie and Namie’s (2004) Workplace Mistreatment Severity Continuum and Blase and Blase’s (2006) Levels of Aggression for Workplace Mistreatment. Findings from this study suggested, first, that the principals participating in this study did experience incidents of general workplace mistreatment ranging from incivility to mobbing, but not physical violence. Secondly, the survey results revealed that the frequency of mistreatments was not high, but that when the incidents did occur, some were perceived as severe and stressful regardless of where they fell on the workplace mistreatment continuum heuristic. Principals suffered a range of negative impacts, some enduring, such as stress, but the negative impacts did not prevent them from expressing high levels of overall job satisfaction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle