« Vous avez bien là dequoy vous contenter les yeux, l'odorat & l'appetit ». Usages, fonctions et enjeux du lexique des perceptions sensorielles dans les récits de voyages français en Amérique (1545-1618)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
What words should be used to describe the sensations of a “new” world? If there is a literary genre that asks this question, it is that of travel literature. Long before the interest in the sensibility of the romantic traveler of the 19th century, men sought to translate their sensations into narratives that served first as eyewitness accounts. Visual perception has thus been linked to the genres of history and inquiry since antiquity. In the Renaissance, travel literature encompasses the history of the discovery of America, the evolution of medicine and the interest in the body, and, finally, the enrichment of language: literary and scientific discourses are both employed in travel literature, because they are both based on the use of experience and knowledge. This thesis highlights this meeting of disciplines by studying a corpus of nine travel narratives to French America (Canada, Florida, Brazil) from Jacques Cartier's 'Brief recit' (1545) to Marc Lescarbot's 'The history of New France' (1618). The thesis considers the process of lexical creation that applies to a new perception. How to say what is unheard of, what has never been felt? The study of the lexicon of the three senses least studied by critics - taste, smell, and touch - allows us first to consider the links between perceptions and sensations, between what is really experienced, and what the traveler-authors translate into texts. Any sensation is necessarily mediated by language. How then to account for this tension between perceptions, sensations and reality? These first questions reveal the extent to which the subject is at the crossroads of a certain number of disciplines, but the research is resolutely literary. In this thesis a lexical approach is adopted which incorporates historicist analyses of the French language in order to study how Renaissance men perceived their bodies, the vocabulary they used to express sensations, and the way they reported on them in travel accounts. The perspective is also comparative: it seems impossible to study this corpus without placing it in a broader European context. Finally, in an attempt to decentre the history of knowledge, it was also important for us to focus on the indigenous oral tradition: how did the American populations, particularly the First Nations, perceive the arrival of the Europeans? The first part of the thesis considers the linguistic stakes of the reconstitution of perceptions in the texts: what are the terms present in the French language of the 16th century used by the authors? Are the texts of the corpus original on this point when we consider the ways in which these terms had been used beforehand? The second part compares a subjective perceptive discourse with a theory of perception as a mode of access to knowledge. In other words, we examine the link between travel literature and medical and scientific knowledge of the time. Finally, we are interested more broadly in the tensions at work in travel literature between a lived perception, source of authentic representations, and a codified perception, artificially articulated to the need to create a sense of wonder, of the extraordinary and of alterity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».