MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7073757323

Lightning currents and electromagnetic fields associated with return strokes to elevated strike objects

2005· other· en· W7073757323 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevuereroDoc Digital Library · 2005
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLightning (connector)Lightning strikeTowerElectromagnetic fieldUpper-atmospheric lightningCurrent (fluid)Electromagnetic pulseElectromagnetic radiation
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lightning currents and electromagnetic fields associated with return strokes to elevated strike objects The aim of this thesis is the modeling of lightning return strokes impacting elevated strike objects such as towers. The theoretical and experimental work done led to the evaluation of the effect of the presence of the strike object on the spatial and temporal distribution of the current along the channel and along the strike object, as well as on the radiated electromagnetic fields associated with that current distribution. The first three chapters of the thesis contain a brief description of the lightning discharge, a review of the relevant experimental data available and an overview of the existing return strokes models for lightning initiated at ground level. The main original contributions of this thesis are presented in Chapters 4 through 6. They consist of experimental and theoretical work as follows. For the purpose of validating our theoretical models versus measurements, we participated, during the summers of 2000 and 2001, in experimental campaigns in Toronto, Canada, where we measured currents and electromagnetic fields associated with lightning strikes to the CN Tower in collaboration with the lightning research group of the University of Toronto. The CN Tower is today's tallest free-standing structure in the world (553 m). The collected data constitute the first simultaneous measurements of lightning current, electric and magnetic fields at two distances from the lightning channel, as well as optical measurements using a fast-speed camera system. The set of measurements obtained in Canada was complemented, in the framework of this thesis, with (a) experimental data of lightning return stroke currents measured simultaneously at two locations at the Peissenberg tower in Germany, provided by Prof. Fridolin Heidler, and (b) measurement results obtained using a reduced-scale model also designed, constructed, and tested in the framework of this thesis. The cumulated data allowed us to characterize the elevated strike object and to validate various theoretical expressions developed in this thesis. We generalized in Chapter 4 the so-called engineering models to include the presence of an elevated strike object. The generalization is based on a distributed-source representation of the return stroke channel, which allowed more general and straightforward formulations of these models, including a self-consistent treatment of the impedance discontinuity at the tower top, as opposed to previous representations implying a lumped current source at the bottom of the channel. We modeled the strike object as a vertically-extended, lossless uniform transmission line, characterized by reflection coefficients at its extremities. Special expressions were also derived for the case of electrically short structures. These expressions can be used to quantify the effect of grounding conditions on the current distribution along the strike object and along the channel. In Chapter 5, using the general expressions for the spatial-temporal distribution of the current in the channel and in the elevated strike object, new expressions for the electric and magnetic fields at far distances were derived. These expressions were evaluated for the cases of electrically-tall and electrically-short structures. For electrically-tall structures, it was found that the presence of the strike object enhances the radiated electric and magnetic field peaks in comparison to return strokes initiated at ground level. The enhancement was quantified through a simple multiplicative factor that depends on the return stroke speed and on the top reflection coefficient associated with the strike object. The mentioned simultaneously measured currents and fields associated with lightning strikes to the CN Tower were used to test the theoretical expressions and a reasonable agreement was found. The derived expressions could find a useful application when lightning currents are measured directly on instrumented towers to calibrate the performance of lightning location systems. In Chapter 6, we analyzed the current into the elevated strike object in the frequency domain, and we derived a closed form expression to evaluate this current taking into account frequencydependent reflection coefficients at the top and at the bottom of the elevated strike object. We derived an expression to calculate the reflection coefficient as a function of frequency at the bottom of the lightning strike object from two currents measured simultaneously at different heights along the strike object. We found that the ground reflection coefficient can be found without prior knowledge of the reflection coefficient at the top of the strike object. We showed that, unless the tower is tall enough that the current injected at the top of the object or its derivative drop to zero before the arrival of reflections, it is impossible, at least under our assumptions, to derive either the reflection coefficient at the top of the strike object or the “undisturbed” current from any number of simultaneous current measurements. We proposed two methods to estimate the top reflection coefficient. The proposed methods were applied to the experimental data obtained on Peissenberg Tower where lightning currents were measured simultaneously at two heights. It was found that the reflection coefficient at ground level can be considered as practically constant over a relatively wide range of frequencies from 100 kHz up to 800 kHz. The estimated top reflection coefficients are in good agreement with values found in the literature. Nevertheless, we found that the estimated values for the top reflection coefficient from the extrapolation method are lower than those found employing the current derivative method. The difference might be due to possible experimental errors and also to the fact that the extrapolation method provides values for the top reflection coefficient calculated from the low-frequency tail of the current waveforms, while the current derivative method uses values associated with the faster parts of the waveform. This observation suggests that the top reflection coefficient is frequency dependent. Finally, a genetic algorithm was applied to extract automatically primary lightning parameters from experimental records obtained on instrumented towers. The algorithm was first tested using theoretical waveforms obtained by assuming values for the ground and top reflection coefficients, and an assumed ‘undisturbed’ current expressed in terms of two Heidler's functions. The algorithm was then applied to the actual, measured lightning return stroke currents obtained at the Peissenberg tower in Germany. The individuals that best satisfied the genetic algorithm's fitness function were selected and compared with the measured waveforms. A good agreement was found.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,320
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuereroDoc Digital LibraryMême sujetPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsTravaux en français237 207