Nepal Family Cohort study: a study protocol
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction The Nepal Family Cohort study uses a life course epidemiological approach to collect comprehensive data on children’s and their parents’ environmental, behavioural and metabolic risk factors. These factors can affect the overall development of children to adulthood and the onset of specific diseases. Among the many risk factors, exposure to air pollution and lifestyle factors during childhood may impact lung development and function, leading to the early onset of respiratory diseases. The global incidence and prevalence of respiratory diseases are rapidly increasing, with the rate of increase in Nepal being the highest. Although the cohort will primarily focus on respiratory health, other health outcomes such as cardiovascular, metabolic and mental health will be assessed to provide a comprehensive overall health assessment. All other health outcomes are self-reported following doctor diagnosis. Some of these health outcomes will be quality controlled during the follow-up by measuring disease specific markers. Our cohort study will likely provide evidence of risk factors and policy recommendations. Methods and analysis Using a life-course epidemiology approach, we established a longitudinal study to address the determinants of lung health and other health outcomes from childhood to adulthood. The baseline data collection (personal data anonymised) was completed in April 2024, and 16 826 participants (9225 children and 7601 parents) from 5829 families were recruited in different geographical and climate areas (hills and plains) of Nepal. We plan to follow up all the participants every 2–3 years. Descriptive analysis will be used to report demographic characteristics and compare rural and semi-urban regions. A linear regression model will assess the association between air pollution, particularly household air pollution (HAP) exposure, and other lifestyle factors, with lung function adjusted for potential confounders. A two-stage linear regression model will help to evaluate lung development based on exposure to HAP. Ethics Ethical approval was obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal, and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Permissions were obtained from two municipalities where the study sites are located. Parents provided signed informed consent and children their assent. Dissemination Findings will be disseminated through traditional academic pathways, including peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. We will also engage the study population and local media (ie, research blogs and dissemination events) and prepare research and policy briefings for stakeholders and leaders at the local, provincial and national levels.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».