MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7074029947

Maternal Deaths, Near misses and Great saves: Severe Maternal Outcomes in Metro East, Western Cape Province, South Africa

2023· dissertation· en· W7074029947 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevuePure Amsterdam UMC · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueTheoretical and Computational Physics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNear missIncidence (geometry)CapeMiddle EastCase fatality ratePregnancyQuarter (Canadian coin)Maternal deathStandardized mortality ratio
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Surveillance of Severe Maternal Outcome (SMO), which is the combination of Maternal Near Miss (MNM) and Maternal Mortality, in the Metro East health district, Western Cape province, South Africa, has given useful insight into its incidence and contributing factors. The MNM-ratio in Metro East was 8.6 per 1,000 livebirths in 2014-2015, and the Maternal Mortality Ratio 49.7 per 100,000 live births, resulting in a SMO-ratio of 9.1 per 1,000 live births. This MNM-ratio identified for Metro East is comparable to the median MNM-ratio reported for middle-income countries of 9.6 per 1,000 livebirths, with a median MNM-ratio of 15.9 per 1,000 in lower-middle and 7.8 per 1,000 in upper-middle income countries. The MNM-ratio in Metro East was slightly higher than the ratio in other regions in South Africa, but case fatality among women with MNM was lower, possibly illustrating a relatively higher quality of care. The main causes of SMO in Metro East were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and major obstetric haemorrhage, which are similar to the commonest causes of SMO in other middle-income countries, and worldwide. Associated factors were a positive HIV-serostatus, birth by caesarean section, preeclampsia and obesity. The relatively large differences in the incidence of SMO between different regions in South Africa, and between different middle-income countries appear to be at least partly explained by difficulties in applying the MNM-tool as proposed by the World Health Organization. We suggest that the tool is currently mostly valuable for assessments of SMO in the local setting, rather than for comparisons between regions or countries. Analyses of SMO in Metro East provided useful insights into local causes: obstetric haemorhage relatively frequently due to placental abruption, often in combination with intrauterine fetal death and hypertension. In contrast with most other settings, hysterectomy for maternal sepsis was as common as for peripartum haemorrhage, both associated with cesarean section. Severe complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were frequent, with pulmonary edema being a particularly common complication leading to maternal death. Early detection and management of preeclampsia, monitoring of fluid balance and cardiac evaluation when pulmonary edema persists, were preventive suggestions. Audit helped identify lessons learned: for all women with SMO, not attending antenatal care was a woman-related factor and missing the diagnosis or not starting adequate management in time were factors at the level of the health worker. In almost a quarter of cases, different management could have prevented SMO. Life style changes, understanding maternal behavior, but also recognizing SMO in an early stage and adequate multidisciplinary management in a critical care setting could reduce SMO and improve its outcomes. Health workers found the identification and analysis of MNM a valuable addition to the already existing confidential enquiry into maternal deaths in South Africa. A national MNM audit was recommended to address causes and improve maternal outcomes. A list of diagnosis additional to those mentioned in the existing MNM tool would help identifying local causes of MNM more precisely. Simplification of the tool would be welcomed in this setting.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,078
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePure Amsterdam UMCMême sujetTheoretical and Computational PhysicsTravaux en français237 207