A Culture Justification and the Queensland Human Rights Act: Evaluation and Future Prospects
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism is one of the most significant interventions in the conceptions of constitutionalism in recent years. It seeks to disrupt the traditionally bifurcated conception of legal and political constitutionalism. The four key features of the new Commonwealth model are now well understood. The first is a legalised and codified charter of rights. The second is mandatory rights review of legislation by the executive and legislative branches of government. The third feature is some form of constitutional review by the courts. And the final feature of this new Commonwealth model is the Parliament having the final say on the legality of legislation. One aspect of this model which is understudied however, is the nature of this inter-institutional dialogue and whether one type should be preferred over another. This thesis approaches this question on the basis of culture. While the new Commonwealth model encourages dialogue, the site of rights protection is ultimately (and particularly in Queensland) with the executive. A culture of justification is therefore necessary in order to effectively protect human rights. This thesis answers the question: To what extent is the culture of justification reflected in executive decision making under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) (QHRA)? It does this by first providing an account of the existing new Commonwealth model rights charters in Canada, Australia and New Zealand to provide the domestic and international context for the QHRA. This is followed by an in depth account of the key features of the QHRA. It then sets out a detailed conception of the culture of justification and how this can be measured by setting out a framework for assessing the extent to which the a culture of justification exists. This framework is then applied to explanatory notes accompanying legislation in the period between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2019 and statements of compatibility between the period 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2023 to assess the extent to which a culture of justification exists. This thesis finds that there has been a meaningful but modest increase in the extent to which the culture of justification exists in executive decision making in Queensland under the QHRA. The frameworks set out in this thesis also set the basis for further study on the extent to which the culture of justification exists in human rights decision making (including for example, through administrative decisions).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».