MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7077148198 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14860586

Labelled dataset to classify direct deforestation drivers in Cameroon: time series

2025· dataset· en· W7077148198 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensInternational Institute for Sustainable Development
Organismes subventionnairesUK Research and Innovation
Mots-clésDeforestation (computer science)Forest coverFilter (signal processing)Land coverTime seriesAmazon rainforestReference dataNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexCloud cover

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Overview This dataset includes the images (visible and near-infrared bands for Landsat-8), auxiliary data (infrared, NCEP, forest gain, OpenStreetMap, SRTM, GFW), and data about forest loss (Global Forest Change) used to evaluate the performance a model to classify direct deforestation and degradation drivers in Cameroon (Cam-ForestNet) using images in multiple year following the forest loss event. This dataset has been created following the same approach as another dataset, accessible here: https://zenodo.org/records/8325259. For more details about how this dataset has been created and can be used, please refer to our paper and code: https://github.com/aedebus/Cam-ForestNet. The paper can be found here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-03384-z. Citation: Debus, A. et al. A labelled dataset to classify direct deforestation drivers from Earth Observation imagery in Cameroon. Sci Data 11, 564 (2024). We used a related approach as the other dataset but, instead of looking at all the images in the five years following the forest loss event, we filter the data to select, for each forest loss polygon, the image with the lowest cloud cover in each of the following four years after the loss event. We only use images with a cloud cover below 20% and keep images where we have at least one image in each of the following four years after the loss event. Description of the files 'my_examples_landsat_nir_per_year.zip': Landsat-8 images, auxiliary data and forest loss data used to test the performance of Cam-ForestNet with time series for a detailed classification of deforestation drivers in Cameroon (15 classes: ‘Oil palm plantation’, ‘Timber plantation’, ‘Fruit plantation (e.g. banana)’, ‘Rubber plantation’, ‘Other large-scale plantation (e.g. tea, sugarcane)’, ‘Grassland/Shrubland’, ‘Small-scale oil palm plantation’, ‘Small-scale maize plantation’, ‘Other small-scale agriculture’, ‘Mining’, ‘Selective logging’, ‘Infrastructure’, ‘Wildfire’, ‘Hunting’, ‘Other’). The subfolders use the suffixes 'first', 'second', 'third', 'fourth' to indicate when the image was taken in relation to the forest loss event, i.e. in the first, second, third or fourth year after the forest loss event. ‘labels.csv’: Csv file, where each image is identified by its path in 'my_examples_landsat_nir_per_year.zip' and given a label. Details about the images Landsat-8 data (courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey), this dataset contains 332x 332 pixels RGB+NIR calibrated top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance images with a 30 m resolution (less than 20% cloud cover). Each forest loss location is associated with four images in each consecutive year following the forest loss event. Details about the auxiliary data Forest gain from GFC: 30-m resolution, yearly data for 2000-2021, downloaded via Google Earth Engine Near infrared, shortwave infrared 1 and 2 bands from Landsat-8 TOA: 30-m resolution, data every 16 days for 2013-2023, downloaded via Google Earth Engine and selected using the same process as for Landsat-8 RGB images From NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2) 6-hourly Products: surface level albedo and volumetric soil moisture content (depths: 0.1 m, 0.4 m, 1.0 m, 2.0m) in 0.01%; radiative fluxes (clear-sky longwave flux downward and upward, clear-sky solar flux downward and upward, direct evaporation from bare soil, longwave and shortwave radiation flux downward and upward, latent, ground and sensible heat net flux), potential evaporation rate, and sublimation in W/m²; humidity (specific, maximum specific, minimum specific) in 10-4 kg/kg; ground level precipitation in 0.1 mm; air pressure at surface level in 10 Pa; wind level (u and v component) in 0.01 m/s, water runoff at surface level in 232.01 kg/ m²; temperature in K: 22264-m resolution, available four times a day for 2011-2023, downloaded directly from the NOAA website and selected the mean of the monthly mean over 5 years before the forest loss event, the monthly maximum over 5 years before the forest loss event, and the monthly minimum over 5 years before the forest loss event for each parameter Closest street and closest city from OpenStreetMap in km: directly downloaded with the Nominatim API Altitude in m, slope and aspect in 0.01° from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM): 30-m resolution, measured for 2000, downloaded via Google Earth Engine Presence of peat from GFW: 232-m resolution, measured for 2017, directly downloaded on the GFW website Details about Global Forest Change For each image, there is a corresponding 'forest_loss_region' .pkl file delimiting a forest loss region polygon from Global Forest Change (GFC). GFC consists of annual maps of forest cover loss with a 30-m resolution. License OpenStreetMap® is open data, licensed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) by the OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) (data in all subfolders '[coordinates]'>'auxiliary'>'closest_city.json'/'closest_street.json'). The documentation is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license (CC BY-SA 2.0). The rest of the data is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The data has been transformed following the code that can be found via this link: https://github.com/aedebus/Cam-ForestNet (in 'prepare_files').

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,043
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,085

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→Travaux en français237 207→