MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7077155528 · doi:10.25959/28030685

The role of tertiary and further education and work in the resettlement experience of former refugees in Tasmania

2025· dissertation· en· W7077155528 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Tasmania · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefugeeWork (physics)Context (archaeology)MultitudeSocial capitalHigher education

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of tertiary and further education (TFE) and work in the resettlement experience of former refugees in Tasmania. It specifically aimed at identifying and exploring the impact of the multitude of factors related to TFE and work engagements of former refugees, that impacted the success of the resettlement experience. <br>Studies have shown that former refugees often have high aspirations for higher education in countries such as the US, Canada, the UK and Australia but various factors hinder their ability to access and perform well (Arar, 2021; Ipek, 2021; Molla, 2022; Nell-Müller, Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, &amp; Happ, 2021; Nickerson et al., 2022). In addition, little is known about how various work opportunities and TFE engagements such as VET, university pathway and other programs available for former refugees shape (or not) their successful resettlement and well-being in Australia (Webb, Faine, Pardy, &amp; Roy, 2017). This limited information on the role of TFE and work in the resettlement experience of former refugees in Australian context provided the impetus for this study. <br>Taking these gaps into consideration, this study was designed to address the following research questions: <br>1) What are the various TFE and work opportunities experienced by former refugees in Tasmania? <br>2) How have former refugees’ TFE and work engagements facilitated (or not) their successful resettlement in Tasmania? <br>3) What are the other factors associated with their TFE and work that influence the resettlement experience of the former refugees? <br>A social capital framework based on social interaction was utilised as a theoretical framework to understand the impact of various micro, meso and macro levels in the successful resettlement of former refugees, especially in relation to the benefits and challenges of the TFE and work engagements in Tasmania. The study employed exploratory sequential mixed method design. A total of 10 refugee support professionals and 17 adult former refugees from various ethnic backgrounds were invited through various Tasmanian based Organisations that support resettlement (OSRs) before finally sitting for face-to-face interview. Additionally, 65 adult former refugees from various ethnic backgrounds filled up the online survey. Both qualitative and quantitative data were generated from refugee support professionals and former refugees using online survey questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. <br>In order to address the research questions, qualitative data were thematically analysed using six step thematic analysis suggested by Braun, Clarke, Hayfield, and Terry (2019). Furthermore, survey data were analysed in IBM SPSS statistics 25 and StataSE 17, using descriptive statistics (Pearson’s chi-square test and Z-tests) and statistical tools that included exploratory factor analysis and multiple linear regression. The following findings were found. <br>First, former refugees engaged in various formal courses (such as VET, university pathway courses and university degree) and informal learning opportunities (such as car driving training, learning activities run by OSRs and everyday communication class) to support language learning needs, social networking and smooth transition to the university and VET in Tasmania. Similarly, most of the former refugees were found to be engaged in low-skilled or semi-skilled work opportunities in Tasmania. As a result, former refugees’ various objectives and context of engaging in different types of TFE and work was identified. <br>Second, the study identified and explored multiple factors in relation to TFE and work engagement of formal refugees that impacted their successful resettlement experience. The main factors were benefits and challenges of TFE and work engagements that impacted the resettlement experience of former refugees by providing access to career pathway information, enrolment in VET and university, better skilled jobs, extended connection to larger Australian networks and growth in confidence necessary to successfully resettle in Tasmania. <br>Third, this study also identified various social and other factors such as demographic characteristics, family and financial factors, refugee targeted programs and policies run by Organisations that support resettlement (OSRs) in Tasmania and former refugees’ social support system that had significant implications over their success of their resettlement. <br>Finally, this study proposed a capitals framework model to explain resettlement success. The model suggested that the quality, amount and varieties of capitals: social capital, human capital, navigational capital, cultural capital and resistant capital, influenced the successful resettlement experience of former refugees in Tasmania.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,477
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,227

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of TasmaniaMême sujetGeochemistry and Geologic MappingTravaux en français237 207