“AUTHENTIC” L2 REVITALIZATION IN KANIEN’KÉHA: THE CASE OF IDIOMS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Kanien’kéha (Mohawk) is an Iroquoian language with fewer than 700 speakers in six communities across Ontario and Quebec (DeCaire 2023). Similarly to most Indigenous languages in Canada, the residential school system led to an abrupt break in its inter-generational transmission in the mid-20th century. Since the 1970s, Kanien’kehá:ka communities have insisted upon the importance of preserving their language, seen as crucial for their identity and culture. This has led to the development of many revitalization projects, the most significant of which are adult immersion programs (Maracle 2002). These stand out by following the strategy of L2 revitalization: create new L2 speakers of child-bearing age, and have them raise L1 children in the language, thereby restoring inter-generational transmission. As articulated by Kanien’kéha teachers themselves, this approach is highly successful, with the key caveat that, to ensure the language survives with minimal influence from English, these L2 speakers must acquire and transmit an “authentic” form of the language (i.e. emulating L1 speech) (Green and Maracle 2018). However, achieving “authenticity” (Hinton and Ahlers 1999) can be challenging, and immersion graduates frequently lack a final layer of proficiency (e.g. L1-like prosody and discourse), hindering communication with L1s. This work investigates this difficulty of acquiring “authentic” Kanien’kéha through a specific case study: idioms (fixed non-compositional expressions, e.g. wa’kerihwahní:rate’ “I confirmed it”, literally “I-idea-hardened-it”). More precisely, I tackle the following issue: what are the implications of idioms for the restoration of Kanien’kéha inter-generational transmission through “authentic” L2 revitalization? To this end, I conducted focus groups with five expert Kanien’kéha language workers, and made the research process as collaborative as possible by letting participants lead the discussion. They arrived at the following conclusions: idioms are crucial for humour and expressive ability, and are thus a central component of the “authentic” Kanien’kéha that must be preserved; but they are semantically opaque and difficult to use in the appropriate contexts for L2 learners, something which can only be remedied by extensive post-immersion exposure to L1 speech. This work contributes to both language revitalization as an academic discipline, as the implications of idioms for revitalization remain under-studied, and the revitalization of Kanien’kéha itself, by clarifying the challenges involved in this issue and suggesting concrete solutions to them. I also hope that this project may constitute another example of the value and feasibility of mobilizing scholarship to serve the interests of collaborating Indigenous communities, following Cameron et al.’s (1992) Empowerment Model.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».