Heritage Assessment Statement of Significance at Church Farm, Abenhall, Mitcheldean, GL17 0DX
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
RDA were commissioned to assess and analyse the historic value and significance of Church Farm and Farm buildings GDII listed along with its setting. To summarise the phasing and significance, the only building to have not seen alterations inside and outside is the threshing barn, although a fire in 1869 meant a new roof was installed and more recently the stone threshing floor was removed. Externally the stone 1858 farm house is little altered and contains inside some Tudor gothic joinery details All other farm buildings listed GDII in their own right have been altered from the description in the listing text of 1985 " a fairly complete and little altered set of mid C19 farm buildings" However, this group is a good example of a planned farmstead buildings continue today, even with the alterations, to make a pleasing group of buildings with aesthetic and design value and are important in the local landscape. This report does include assessment of significance of the heritage asset and its surroundings and analysis of the historic fabric as found and could be seen on 17th December 2024 There was one site visit made on 17th December 2024 to access and take photographs, equivalent to a Level 2 Building Recording, [Ref Understanding Historic Buildings A Guide to Good Recording Practice Historic England May 2016] as a means of assessing the significance of Church Farm Abenhall. The historic building/s, Church Farm Abenhall have not been analysed or recorded to this level in the past, including features that have not been recorded since the list description. This means this building and listed outbuildings have not been fully understood or its significance realised. With reference to Statements of Heritage Significance: Analysing Significance in Heritage Assets October 2019 A significance level has been added for guidance based on Conservation Principles, English Heritage, 2008 p72 and a Statement of Heritage Significance provided by RDA. Aesthetic - designed value: farmhouse and farmstead designed architecturally in typical 19th century model farm style ,stone and slate, with an earlier date stone threshing barn, largely unaltered, earlier stone granary -converted in 1998 that with conversion has now diminished its original significance. All other farm buildings have been altered from the description in the listing text of 1985 " a fairly complete and little altered set of mid C19 farm buildings. Historical - illustrative value: the layout is illustrative of a former 19th century model farmhouse and farmstead although most interiors have changed and the cowhouses appearance with regard to the external openings have changed. Historical - associative value: the site has historical association with Edmund Probyn, a prominent local landowner and farmers from the Scudamore family, farmers in the 20th century, before changes to equine use in 1993. C19 Architects Girdwood and Thompson of London. However, this group is a good example of a planned farmstead buildings continue today, even with the alterations, to make a pleasing group of buildings with aesthetic and design value and are important in the local landscape. It is hoped this report has aided a planning application for changes and for the LPA to make an informed decision.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,126 | 0,030 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».