The Subjective Necessity of Nonviolence
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
HILE IT'S THE FIRST TIME JEFF TURNER-my partner for almost thirty years-has been in this room, it's not my first time.I've been here before, many times, and over several decades.You see, I started-but could not have brought off without the invaluable assistance of my co-director Janet Miller-the JCT-associated conferences (JCT a journal I also started but could not have brought off without Janet Miller, who served as Managing Editor).The first of these meetings was held at the Airlie House in Warrenton, Virginia, that location thanks to University of Virginia Professor Charles W. Beegle, a student of Paul Klohr, as is Janet Miller and Tom Poetter's mentor at Indiana University, Norm Overly.The year was 1978.Bill Schubert might have been there.James B. Macdonald was.At those first meetings, our conference wasn't large enough to occupy the entire place; maybe our second year there we learned that we were sharing the place with the CIA, a fact that prompted us to move the meeting.I think it was through University of Dayton Professor Joseph Watras that Paul Klohr learned of the Bergamo Center, as you know associated with the Catholic Church, not the CIA but another institution not all progressive people appreciate.Paul and I drove here in 1981-I was still teaching at the University of Rochester, where I'd met Janet Miller-and we decided it will do.The first conference was held here in 1982, the name JCT conference soon replaced by the Bergamo Conference (informally only, as the conference site director discouraged us from officially adopting the name).Tonight, here, in this room where I've been so many times before, I am responding to the call of nonviolence, a call Hongyu Wang heard first and resounded to the rest of us in curriculum studies.What I'm presenting tonight is a course of study juxtaposing-a term Janet Miller brought to my attention, one also developed by Teresa Strong-Wilson-a series of fragments, a term Tom Poetter (2025) employs in his moving new book titled Curriculum Fragments.A literaryphilosophical term, fragment is also a scientific, specifically geological term, as geologists reconstruct the past by "using mere fragments to tell a larger story" (Schulz, 2024).If you'd like a glimpse into Tom's curriculum fragments-before asking your university library to purchase a copy-go to www.curriculumstudies.ca-scrolldown the table of contents on the left, click on our YouTube channel, and there-among other offerings-you'll find the book launches I've hosted, among them Tom's, but also others, including the launch of James Burns' (2023) important new book-Curriculum and the Problem of Violence: Biopolitics, Truth, History and Fascism-and W
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».