MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7082144552 · doi:10.5284/1136163

Redcliff Quarter 2: Redcliff Street and St Thomas Street, Bristol. Additional Archaeological Evaluation: Phase 1

2018· article· en· W7082144552 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchaeology Data Service · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTrenchExcavationAlluviumFootprintQuarter (Canadian coin)BrickSequence (biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The fieldwork comprised the excavation of ten trenches (numbers 25-34) in the locations shown on the attached plan. The exact locations of a number of trenches were altered slightly from the original proposal agreed in the WSI due to a variety of constraints, with the approval of Peter Insole. Trench 26 was not fully excavated, the northern half being omitted due to access requirements, although the trench was extended westwards to define the extent of a modern cellar. To the centre of the site, Trench 28 was located wholly along the length of a deep modern cellar. The eastern part of this trench was moved southwards so as to enable an investigation of an intact sequence of earlier deposits identified just beyond the footprint of the cellar. The presence of an existing site car park, and a brick and concrete fuel tank, to the west of the site restricted the northern extent of Trench 29. Trench 33 was moved a few metres to the north, away from the site boundary. The site entrance was directly adjacent to Trench 31 so that to continue safe access and egress to the site, the western end of the trench was moved to the north. These alterations to the trench locations were not detrimental to completing the aims and objectives, and in some cases provided a clearer window through undisturbed archaeological deposits, down to the underlying alluvial substrate. Archaeological monitoring of the removal of an 'Interceptor Tank' by contractors was also undertaken and is included in the results of this report. Trenches were set out on OS National Grid (NGR) co-ordinates using Leica GPS and surveyed in accordance with CA Technical Manual 4 Survey Manual. An archaeological evaluation was undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology in September- October 2017 at Redcliff Quarter, Redcliff and St Thomas Street, Bristol. Ten trenches were excavated. Evidence of activity from the early 12th-century occupation of Redcliff through to the modern period was identified during the evaluation. Medieval activity comprised the setting out of plots on a north-east/south-west axis, fronting onto Redcliff Street to the west and St Thomas Street to the east. A historic boundary, the 'Law Ditch' formed the rear property boundaries, though no evidence of an earth-cut ditch was identified. Instead, evidence was uncovered for the culverting of the Law Ditch within a pair of stone-built revetment walls during the medieval period, with further enhancements during the post-medieval and modern periods. The evaluation also uncovered evidence for small-scale industrial activity at the rear of the Redcliff Street plots during the medieval period, in the form of the partial remains of a probably dye-vat base. A Victorian kiln or furnace with two fireboxes was also excavated near the corner of Redcliff Street and Three Queens Lane. The function of the kiln/furnace was unclear, and although kiln spacers found in a nearby trench during the evaluation were of a type used in pottery and clay tobacco-pipe manufacture, vitrified slag recovered from the base of the structure also suggests the possibility that it was an iron foundry. Post-medieval cellars were identified belonging to properties on both Redcliff Street and St Thomas Street. Despite a large amount of truncation by post-medieval and modern features, the medieval archaeology was generally well preserved, where it survived, with the most intact area of medieval features and stratigraphy located in the south-west of the site.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,271
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0030,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchaeology Data ServiceMême sujetGeochemistry and Geologic MappingTravaux en français237 207