Systemic immune-inflammation index and risk of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been a marker and prognostic indicator of several diseases. However, its utility in pregnancy is unknown. Herein, we reviewed the evidence on the ability of SII to predict gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted for studies comparing SII between GDM/PE and non-GDM/non-PE groups. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy data were also included. The last date of the search was 5 November 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted comparing values of SII between GDM/PE and non-GDM/non-PE groups. Nine studies were eligible. Four studies reported data on GDM and five on PE. Most studies measured SII in the first trimester. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the SII values between PE and non-PE groups (MD: 13.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): −117.21, 143.35, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 78%). Meta-analysis of four studies comparing data of GDM and non-GDM groups showed that SII was significantly higher in GDM females (MD: 210.32, 95% CI: 57.3, 363.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 94%). The sensitivity of SII to predict PE varied from 40 to 77.5% while specificity varied from 53.8 to 67.5%. For studies on GDM, the sensitivity and specificity values varied from 66 to 80.2% and 34.4 to 65%, respectively. SII values are significantly higher in GDM compared to non-GDM females. However, SII values did not correlate with PE. SII may have potential in predicting GDM which needs to be explored by further studies. The systemic immune-inflammation index, a blood count-based index, has been used to predict disease occurrence and outcomes. However, its role in pregnancy remains unclear. We searched scientific literature for studies that compared SII values between pregnant women with and without gestational diabetes/preeclampsia (PE). After combining data from studies, we noted that SII values were not notably different between women with or without PE. However, it was noted that SII values was notably higher in women with gestational diabetes. To conclude, SII levels are much higher in women with GDM compared to women who do not have gestational diabetes. But SII value does not seem to be linked to PE.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».