MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7084155488 · doi:10.19663/j.issn2095-9869.20241018003

Identification and Soluble Expression of Recombinant Proteins of fshβ in Conger myriaster

2025· article· en· W7084155488 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueMachine Learning in Materials Science
Établissements canadiensYellow Island Aquaculture (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAmino acidSignal peptideTransmembrane domainTransmembrane proteinComplementary DNAPeptide sequenceGlycosylationRecombinant DNA

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Conger myriaster is commercially important in fisheries and aquaculture. The artificial culture of C. myriaster is presently conducted by catching wild fry. Recently, this resource has notably declined, highlighting an urgent need to develop seedling production for its aquaculture. C. myriaster gonads cannot mature naturally in artificial culture owing to insufficient synthesis of endogenous gonadotropins. However, their gonads can be induced to mature by injecting hormones in vivo. The follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) gene is crucial in fish sexual development and reproduction, and its regulatory mechanisms have been extensively studied. In this study, the coding sequence (CDS) of fshβ was cloned by PCR techniques. Bioinformatical analysis revealed that the CDS of FSH comprises 378 bp, encoding 125 amino acids. By analyzing the physical and chemical properties of the protein, the fshβ protein has a molecular weight of 13.19 kDa. The aliphatic index was 71.04, and the theoretical pI was 6.00. An instability index value of 51.57 indicates a state of instability. The functional domain analysis showed that the fshβ protein has a highly conserved GHB functional domain (comprising 104 amino acids at 19–122). The hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity analysis revealed that the fshβ protein is a hydrophilic protein. The 6th and 7th amino acids (Ala) and 8th amino acid (Leu) exhibited the strongest hydrophobicity (2.178), whereas the 106th amino acid (Asn) exhibited the strongest hydrophilicity (–1.722). The leader peptide and transmembrane domain analyses of fshβ protein revealed that the 1–19 amino acids are signal peptides without any transmembrane domains. The analysis of protein glycosylation sites showed that the fshβ protein contains two N-glycosylation sites and three O-glycosylation sites. The analysis of protein phosphorylation sites demonstrated that the fshβ protein contains 14 potential phosphorylation sites. Specifically, seven serine (Ser) and seven tyrosine (Tyr) phosphorylation sites exist. Subcellular localization analysis revealed that the fshβ protein was mainly localized in the nucleus. The secondary structure of the fshβ protein mainly comprises an alpha helix (12.0%), extended strand (24.8%), and random coil (63.2%). The tertiary structure of C. myriaster fshβ protein was compared with that of Anguilla japonica, A. rostrata, A. Anguilla, A. marmorata and Homo sapiens. The C. myriaster fshβ protein tertiary structure was observed to be similar to that of A. Japanica, A. rostrata, A. Anguilla, A. marmorata. However, differences were observed with the tertiary structure of H. sapiens. Based on the sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis, the C. myriaster fshβ exhibited a closer evolutionary relationship with A. japonica, A. rostrata, A. anguilla and A. marmorata. The fshβ amino acid sequence of C. myriaster compared with A. japonica, A. rostrata, A. anguilla, and A. marmorata revealed similarities of 70.08%, 70.08%, 70.08% and 68.50%, respectively. The fshβ of C. myriaster exhibits high homology with other eels but low homology with other bony fish and mammals, indicating that fshβ has evolutionary differences during evolution. This study presents the successful production of recombinant C. myriaster fshβ protein using the pET-28a(+) expression system. NdeⅠ and XhoⅠ cleavage sites were inserted at both ends of the primers, and then fshβ was amplified by PCR. Subsequently, the fragment was conjugated to the pEASY-T1 vector to obtain the recombined plasmids, named pEASY-T1-fshβ. The recombinant plasmid pEASY-T1-fshβ and the pET-28a(+) vector were double-digested using restriction endonuclease NdeⅠ/XhoⅠ. After double-digested, the fragment was ligated into the pET-28a(+) vector to obtain the recombined plasmids named pET-28a-fshβ. To investigate the biological activities and physiological significance of pET-28a-fshβ, we used the pET protein fusion and purification system to produce plasmids pET-28a-fshβ in Trans1-T1 competent cells. Recombinant plasmids pET-28a-fshβ were transferred into Rosetta (DE3) cells, which were cultured under different IPTG induction conditions (0.01, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mmol/L) at a temperature of 16 ℃ for 16 h. fshβ was efficiently expressed at different IPTG concentrations and under the above induction conditions. Therefore, the following optimized parameters were used in subsequent experiments: IPTG concentration of 0.5 mmol/L, incubated at 16 ℃ for 16 h. The supernatant and precipitate were analyzed using SDS-PAGE following induction of expression. SDS-PAGE analysis showed an evident thickened band at 26.0 kDa. It was also present in the supernatant as a soluble protein. The protein was purified using a His-tagged nickel affinity chromatography column. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of the purified protein, demonstrating that the recombinant protein was specifically recognized by antibodies. The molecular mass of the protein was approximately 26.0 kDa, which was consistent with the expected size. This result indicates that the fshβ recombinant protein was successfully expressed. The results of this study revealed the preparation of recombinant fshβ protein in the C. myriaster to provide a theoretical reference for the subsequent use of exogenous recombinant fshβ protein to induce sexual maturation in Parent fish.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,202
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,123
Tête enseignante GPT0,517
Écart entre enseignants0,394 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Même sujetMachine Learning in Materials ScienceTravaux en français237 207