An environmental scan of peer support programs in Ontario, Canada for adults with special health care needs and their caregivers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To conduct an environmental scan of known peer support programs implemented for adults with chronic health conditions and/or their caregivers in Ontario, Canada and synthesize these results, to inform future efforts to co-design peer support programs with and for adults with special health care needs (ASCN). A systematic online search was performed, to identify peer support programs for individuals with chronic health conditions and their caregivers in Ontario. Relevant program details were extracted from peer support group webpages and where possible peer support program coordinators were contacted for additional information. Twenty programs met inclusion criteria. There was considerable variation in the type of peer support programs offered across Ontario. Despite this heterogeneity, the environmental scan identified several important trends across program offerings. Key amongst these are inclusive programming for both patients and family, and individualized/flexible service delivery. Program and outcome evaluation was lacking across programs. Peer support programs in Ontario used diverse strategies but shared the goal of creating safe spaces for individuals with similar lived experiences to connect. Future research on peer support programs for people with chronic health conditions should assess short- and long-term outcomes to evaluate their impact on populations served. Peer support programs for individuals with chronic health conditions located in Ontario, Canada used diverse strategies but shared the mutual goal of creating safe spaces for individuals with similar lived experiences to connect.A safe space is a fundamental aspect of peer support which allows emotional connections to flourish and people to experience a sense of belonging.Given the often unpredictable nature of living with a chronic health condition, flexible and hybrid peer support program models that prioritize individual choice are essential, as they enable individuals to participate in ways that work best for them.Incorporating peer-support as an integral element of care may benefit individuals living with chronic health conditions. Peer support programs for individuals with chronic health conditions located in Ontario, Canada used diverse strategies but shared the mutual goal of creating safe spaces for individuals with similar lived experiences to connect. A safe space is a fundamental aspect of peer support which allows emotional connections to flourish and people to experience a sense of belonging. Given the often unpredictable nature of living with a chronic health condition, flexible and hybrid peer support program models that prioritize individual choice are essential, as they enable individuals to participate in ways that work best for them. Incorporating peer-support as an integral element of care may benefit individuals living with chronic health conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,013 | 0,027 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».