Geochemistry Implications of Runoff at the Livestock and Forage Centre of Excellence
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objectives of this research were to determine the potential volume losses of water and associated constituent ions contained in cattle feedlot runoff through the runoff ditches at the USask Livestock and Forage Center of Excellence and the fate of the major anions and cations typically found in cattle feedlot runoff as they transport through the subsurface soils. This was accomplished through the investigation of the transport of five major cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+, and NH4+) and three major anions (Cl-, HCO3-, and SO42-) in laboratory soil columns. The columns were packed with two different soils: a clay present in the pen floors, and a silty clay present in the drainage ditches. The columns were then equilibrated with groundwater from the site. A simulated feedlot runoff solution was then flushed through the soil columns, followed by a simulated rainwater solution to represent season impacts. The breakthrough curves obtained by both stages of the experiment were used to identify key processes affecting the transport of the species. During the simulated runoff stage, Ca2+ was replaced on the exchange sites by Na+, K+, and NH4+ for all the columns (both soils). Generally, ions with higher valency will exchange for those of lower valency, but the majority of the ions in the feedlot runoff solution have a lower valency, replacing those of higher valency, such as Ca2+, through mass action. Ca2+ was replaced first, followed by Mg2+ once the ionic strength of the solution was higher. All columns had HCO3- concentrations below input concentrations. This was believed to be due to the precipitation of carbonate minerals. The pen clay columns demonstrated SO42- concentrations much higher than input concentrations. This, along with the high Ca2+ concentrations in the column effluent suggested that gypsum (CaSO4) dissolution was occurring from the soil. The solubility of gypsum at 25°C is 2000-2500 mg/L (Lebedev and Kosorukov 2017) and the average effluent concentration of SO42- was approximately 1600 mg/L which appeared to confirm the source of sulphate in the effluent. Simulated rainwater was then placed on top of the columns to assess the permanency of the attenuation of ions of interest. In all columns the effluent contained excess K+ and Na+, indicating the previously attenuated ions came back into solution off the exchange complex. There was also excess HCO3- and Ca2+, suggesting the dissolution of calcite. In the ditch silty clay columns, the concentration of Mg2+ was below the input concentration, indicating Mg2+ was sorbed on the exchange complex, replacing Na+, K+, and NH4+. In the pen clay columns, the SO42- and Ca2+ concentrations in the effluent remained well above the input concentrations. This suggests the dissolution of gypsum continued during the rainwater flushing stage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».