Feasibility and Usability Test of a Developed Cognitive Training System Based on Smart Mirror: Targeting Community-Dwelling Patients with Chronic Stroke
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The feasibility of the implemented cognitive training system based on smart mirror revealed significant differences in the total score, delayed recall, and orientation items of the MoCAK (P<.05). Additionally, a notable improvement was observed in the accuracy and response time of task performance in the CoSAS (P<.05). Usability test results indicated an SUS mean score of 73.5 (SD 17.25) and an Adapted IMI score of 5.63 (SD 1.55), surpassing suggested thresholds for usability tests. Ten chronic stroke patients aged 60 years or older, each with independent mobility in the community, were involved in this study. The validation process included a 30-minute cognitive training session administered twice a week for eight weeks. The training regimen encompassed a blend of targeted cognitive domain exercises and virtual reality training. The feasibility of cognitive function assessments employed the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCAK) and the Cognitive Assessment System for the Elderly (CoSAS). Pre- and post-test results were compared. Additionally, usability test was performed at the end of the experiment using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Adapted Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Statistical analyses for cognitive function involved calculating mean and standard deviation values for all variables using the SPSS program. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was then employed to compare pre- and postcognitive function result This study seeks to feasibility a cognitive training system based on smart mirror designed for chronic stroke patients residing in the community and usability test of the associated training equipment. The outcomes of the feasibility and usability test affirm the utility, safety, and motivational aspects of the developed cognitive training system based on smart mirror. Consequently, we advocate for further validation of the training system’s efficacy and usability through clinical trials, specifically targeting groups aiming to enhance cognitive function. Future research should encompass usability and clinical validation of the product across diverse populations, including not only chronic stroke patients but also older adults in the community and children with cognitive impairment. It should incorporate a larger sample size and include a control group. Additionally, research efforts should be directed toward substantiating the effectiveness of cognitive training content and developing tailored programs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle