MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7093363370 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.002

ELIMINATING ROUTINE POSTOPERATIVE RADIOGRAPHS FOR SURGICALLY MANAGED PAEDIATRIC SUPRACONDYLAR HUMERUS FRACTURES

2025· article· en· W7093363370 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueElbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRadiographyHumerusPercutaneous pinningSplint (medicine)Orthopedic surgeryReduction (mathematics)Percutaneous

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the rate at which follow-up radiographs altered management plans in surgically-managed paediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures that were intra-operatively stable following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). From June 2020 until May 2022, all SCH fractures managed with CRPP a single paediatric academic tertiary care hospital were identified. Our routine post-operative care pathway included an initial post-operative visit at 3 weeks for splint and wire removal followed by radiographs, and a clinical assessment. At the 3-week follow-up visit, clinicians were asked to document their management decision before evaluating the post-operative radiograph. A further clinical review, without radiographs, occurred at 12 weeks. Patients were excluded from the pathway and received individualized treatment plans if the treating surgeon was concerned with stability after CRPP based on intra-operative fluoroscopic examination; if the patient had an open fracture; or if the patient required an open reduction. Patients were excluded if their charts failed to document whether the patient was safe for the routine pathway, or if they incurred complications that were identified at unscheduled post-operative visits (e.g. for infection). Patients whose radiographs were evaluated before a treatment decision was documented were also excluded from analysis. Intervention after pin removal due to radiographic findings was the primary outcome variable of interest (e.g. additional immobilization, radiographs ordered at 12 week visit, etc.). 623 patients underwent surgical management for SCHF during the study period. 140 patients were excluded; 27 patients were deemed unsafe for the routine post-operative pathway based on intra-operative stability assessment after fixation, 3 patients with open fractures, 15 patients requiring open reduction, 31 with incomplete documentation of suitability for the pathway, 62 whose radiographs were evaluated before a treatment decision was document, and 2 patients were developed a post-operative infection at an unscheduled visit. 483 patients were Included in the final analysis. Radiographs altered management in 3 patients (0.6%). 2 patients had slow callous formation (1 placed in a splint for a further week, 1 had an additional visit with radiographs ordered at 6 weeks). 1 patient was identified as having cubitus varus on radiographs and additional radiographs were ordered for the scheduled 12-week visit. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that radiographs altered management in 0/188 (0%) type 2 SCH fractures, in 2/239 (0.8%) type 3 SCH fractures, and in 1/47 (2%) of type 4 SCH fractures. There is minimal utility to routine post-operative follow-up radiographs following uncomplicated CRPP of SCH fractures. Any post-operative imaging should be reserved for patients who have questionable intra-operative stability following fracture fixation or those with concerns identified on clinical examination. We have removed all post-operative radiographs from our routine post-operative care pathway for Type 2 and 3 SCH fractures. By eliminating routine post-operative radiographs for the vast majority of SCH fractures, we will decrease the time and financial burden on families and the healthcare system without negatively impacting patient outcomes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,220
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOrthopaedic ProceedingsMême sujetElbow and Forearm Trauma TreatmentTravaux en français237 207