MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7093794376

Review of <i>With Unshakeable Persistence: Rural Teachers\nof the Depression Era</i> By Elizabeth McLachlan

2001· article· W7093794376 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueInsecta mundi · 2001
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGovernment (linguistics)Depression (economics)Great DepressionRural areaAgriculture
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1905 the Canadian government separated several districts from the Northwest Territories to establish the Provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan. Both provinces continued the centralized education system of the Territories. The newly-formed Departments of Education were expected to provide schooling in the recently settled agricultural areas, but were often unable to persuade parents to erect school districts. In 1910 the situation was bleak; Alberta and Saskatchewan had the lowest school age enrollment figures in the country.\nOver the next twenty years, both departments accelerated the establishment of school districts administered by locally elected trustees and funded by local property taxes and small government grants. In rural locations this usually meant a one-room school of six to eight grades serving a four-square-mile area. In 1935 Alberta had 3,800 such districts; while not all were active, most operated single-room, multi-grade, one-teacher schools.\nElizabeth McLachlan's With Unshakeable Persistence contains the recollections of two men and five women who taught in one-room schools in Alberta and Saskatchewan during the Great Depression. The recollections of another forty teachers are drawn upon in discussions of the teachers' role, their accommodation, social life, and the schools themselves. The reader is also reminded of the devastating effects the 1930s Depression and natural disasters had on prairie life which led to many farm abandonments and a dwindling number of schools.\nOne result of these conditions was a surplus of teachers, including many recent normal school graduates with first-class teaching certificates. One-room school job notices prompted hundreds of applications. As a McLachlan interviewee put it, "My teaching career began in 1931. That was the year when teachers were a dime a dozen." School trustees negotiated salaries well below the average annual wage of $1,076 in Saskatchewan and $1,055 in Alberta at the beginning of the Depression. For example, a teacher's salary was $90 a month in the Wealthy School District in Alberta in 1929 but dropped the next year to $50. By 1932 the annual salary in Saskatchewan fell to $476, but as McLachlan notes, "Many teachers received far less and some nothing at all." Sometimes room and board was provided in lieu of part of a teacher's salary.\nDepartment officials, school trustees, and parents believed the women teachers who staffed these one-room schools had the wherewithal to serve them well. They were expected to teach a full range of subjects and grades, and while they were sometimes overwhelmed by the task, most held on. The interviewees, without exception, feared the visits of school inspectors and were not given to complaining for fear of losing their jobs.\nMcLachlan has written a small and interesting study, and her efforts to gather the views of the teachers themselves turns out to have been much more than an anecdotal or hagiographic exercise. The book leaves the strong impression that the children who had the benefit and care of these teachers were shaped in unique, positive, and advantageous ways during the years of the Great Depression.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,537
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInsecta mundiMême sujetPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsTravaux en français237 207