Review of <i>Cowboys, Ranchers and the Cattle Business:Cross-Border Perspectives on Ranching History</i> Edited by Simon Evans, Sarah Carter, and BillYeo
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This collection presents a selection of papers delivered at the Canadian Cowboy Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, in 1997 in conjunction with the Glenbow Museum's "Canadian Cowboy Exhibition." The subtitle indicates the main theme, but American readers should note that all of the authors focus on ranching north of the border, and particularly on southern Alberta. They present new research from that frontier and compare it to the existing literature in the United States. The main purpose of their efforts, however, is to challenge the traditional vision of Canadian ranching first articulated by Lewis G. Thomas and refined by such disciples as David Breen, Sheilagh Jameson, and Patrick Dunae, a vision of Canadian ranching that contrasts sharply with the American experience. Canada, they claimed, presented an orderly frontier dominated by a paternalistic British-Canadian elite that lent an aristocratic tone to ranching society. By contrast, the authors in this collection find striking similarities with the American range. Terry Jordan-Bychkov concludes that Canadian ranching techniques typify the American "Midwestern system" described in his own seminal work. Simon Evans demonstrates that American ranch managers and foremen taught those techniques to British and Canadian greenhorns, and Joy Oetelaar provides a sketch of George Lane, the most prominent American cattleman on the Canadian range. Warren Elofson argues that the northern frontier featured more crime and violence than Canadian mythology admits. Two articles offer novel comparisons. Brian Dippie demonstrates that Western artist Charles M. Russell visualized no cross-border differences in ranching or cowboys, and Lorain Lounsberry chronicles how Canadians participated in, and even organized, their own "Wild West" shows based on the Buffalo Bill model. The parallels drawn by the authors are persuasive, but not conclusive. Some articles are too brief or rely too heavily on anecdotal evidence to be more than suggestive. Moreover, they do not directly address many of the contentions of Thomas and company. Significantly, no representative from that school is included in this collection, although Alan McCullough examines one member of the British-Canadian elite in his portrait of Fred Stimson, part-owner and first manager of the mammoth North West Cattle Company (the Bar U). And not every article in the collection deals with cross-border comparisons. Henry Klassen on the economic history of two mid-sized ranches and Max Foran on changes in ranch lease policies move into the virtually uncharted post-1914 era, while Sarah Carter offers a preliminary glimpse at neglected participants in ranching: women and Native people. The articles in this collection do not resolve the debate about the similarities and differences between Canadian and American ranching, but they do provide insights that deserve to be read and considered.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,016 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».