MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7094349971

The Colour of Women’s Culture: Natural Dyeing as Self-Expression\nin America, Japan, Norway and Australia

2008· article· W7094349971 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueInsecta mundi · 2008
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineChemistry
ThématiqueChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNatural (archaeology)Context (archaeology)CraftDyeingClothingPopularityPrivilege (computing)Textile design
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Natural dyes are currently undergoing a revival in craft and academic circles. The resurgence of attention is due to several factors. One is the popularity of natural dyes among European textile historians, dye chemists, and archaeologists, all of whom rely on natural dyes as an academic and educational tool. Scholars worldwide have developed a rigorous cultural context for natural dyes that embraces disparate fields such as clothing and textiles, religion and philosophy, nineteenth-century medicine, and as curious as it may seem, eighth-century Irish law. Other prominent themes in natural dyeing today are contemporary aspects of gender, ecology, and ethics. Art history and aesthetics are also timely issues in academic circles; it is not uncommon for masters’ theses and doctoral dissertations to feature natural dyes as the central theme. Moreover, natural dyes appear to have surmounted (and survived) the art/craft debate as the creation of colour from plants, animals, and other organisms is more widely referenced now in general history, material culture, fashion and clothing, consumerism, cultural tourism, and also in women’s studies. The four women whose work is presented as part of this organized session reflect, both individually and collectively, many of these aspects of natural dyeing. They are also visual artists, farmers, professors, writers, marketers, entrepreneurs, designers, and business managers. Yet it is colour that unites them: all practise natural dyeing and all share a passion for making colour with their own two hands. It has also been my privilege to have ‘taught’ each of them; I use the emphasis because this process has been a two-way exchange where I learned as much as I gave. Moreover, their work has reached an international audience which speaks to the validity of natural dyes as a career choice for women in art, craft, cultural history, gender studies, and education.\nAside from a one-day workshop in the 1970s, I had no one to teach me how to make natural dyes. As an autodidactic student, I took another path; one by one, I located the leading practitioners of natural dyeing in Canada, the USA, Britain, Scandinavia, and Australia. I wrote letters. Some wanted to meet, so I applied for grants in Canada and I also received funding from my home province of Nova Scotia. Then, after the publication of Craft of the Dyer in 1980 (the so-called second revival of craft dyeing), it was my time to pursue professional natural dyeing as a life choice. My first task was to learn from the ‘masters’ whatever they were prepared to share, and then, to make certain their assistance was acknowledged and their contribution celebrated. A case in point was Eileen Bolton who died three weeks before I reached north-central Wales.5 Yet I have fond memories of all that I learned from Rita Adrosko, Fred Gerber, Jim Liles, Winifred Shand, and Gösta Sandberg. There was also a memorable visit with Mary Frances Davidson, and closer to home, frequent long visits with Dorothy Burnham. I also corresponded with two illustrious British dyers, Viloletta Thurston, and Elsie Davenport. There was one visit with Seonaid Robertson, and I was invited later to consult on a book by Jenny Dean.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,075
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInsecta mundiMême sujetChemistry and Stereochemistry StudiesTravaux en français237 207