A review of karst collapse mechanisms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Karst collapse is a global geohazard and has been reported to occur in 23 countries, including China, the United States of America, Canada, South Africa, Italy, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Russia, and Turkey. The mechanism of karst collapse is the basis for its monitoring, early warning, prevention and treatment. For a long time, studies on the mechanism of karst collapse have been mainly based on the qualitative speculation of the investigation after karst collapse, involving geological conditions and influencing factors of the collapse. They lack support of scientifically defensible data, hence resulting in the hypothetical stage of current studies on karst collapse mechanism. This has become a technical bottleneck in the prediction and prevention of karst collapse hazard.Karst collapse hazards are characterized by concealment and suddenness. Among the existing collapse events in China, more than 90% are soil collapse. Studies on karst collapse in China started in the 1980s and have gone through approximately four phases， (1) The sporadic karst collapse research in selected mines; (2) The karst collapse inventory and small-scale physical modeling in Yangtze River Basin, and representative mines and railroads; (3) The karst collapse reconnaissance and large-scale physical modeling in urban areas including Wuhan, Yulin, Tangshan, Tongling, Guilin, and Shenzhen; (4) The systematic nation-wide karst collapse reconnaissance. Since 2000, National Natural Science Foundation of China has increased investment in the studies on karst collapse involving groundwater pumping, foundation piling, tunneling, drainage in mines, and train vibration and in the studies on karst collapse mechanisms induced by extreme climate. At present, there are about eight karst collapse mechanisms according to previous studies, such as subduction, vacuum negative pressure, pressure difference, hydraulic fracturing, gas explosion, chemical dissolution, resonance, liquefaction, etc. These processes are closely associated with changing underground hydrodynamic conditions.With a profound analysis of definitions and theoretical basis of karst collapse mechanism, this study proposes that most of the above mechanisms can be attributed to seepage deformation of soil. This means, under the action of groundwater seepage force or dynamic water pressure, some particles of the whole soil mass will move, causing deformation and destruction of soil or rock mass. During the formation of karst collapse, the action mode and direction of groundwater seepage force on karst cavities roof soil will be different because of the change of groundwater dynamic conditions. The limit equilibrium theory of soil mechanics considers the roof stability of karst cavities, which is the last stage in the development of karst collapse; the effect of surface load is only to shorten the time of ground collapse.Finally, it is pointed out that due to the practicability of water-air pressure with high-frequency sampling, accelerometer and acoustic wave sensors, the research direction on collapse mechanisms will be changed from hydrostatic pressure to hydrodynamic pressure, a challenge that should be faced with. The cavitation damage and resonance damage caused by pressure pulsation will also be the future research focus, and the corresponding critical seepage deformation or damage indicators need to be further studied the prevention and control of geological disasters of karst collapse.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,099 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».