How do individuals with spinal cord injury practice mindfulness? Barriers & facilitators to practicing mindfulness and considerations for tailoring programs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This qualitative study aims to understand how individuals with SCI experience and participate in mindfulness, including identifying barriers and facilitators to participation. A qualitative descriptive approach following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was implemented. Participants partook in one-on-one telephone interviews which explored their experiences with mindfulness. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo. 22 participants from the United States and Canada participated. The majority were female, between 28–67 years old. Two main themes and six sub-themes were identified. The first main theme related to perceived experiences and anticipated benefits related to practicing mindfulness (e.g. reduced muscle tension, reduced stress, social connection). Sub-themes included: physical benefits, mental benefits, social/interpersonal benefits, and mind and/or body awareness. The second main theme related to perceived barriers to practicing mindfulness (e.g. misconceptions of mindfulness, language and cues) and mitigating strategies (e.g. education, permissive rather than prescriptive language). Sub-themes included awareness and understanding of mindfulness and accessibility. Our study provides evidence for content and language that could be tailored specifically for individuals with SCI, and points to the need for general education and awareness for what mindfulness is and is not. Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) have potentially positive influences on physical, mental, social and mind and/or body awareness in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).Findings from this and similar studies can be used to develop or tailor a MBI for individuals with SCI.Implementation of MBIs can significantly enhance rehabilitation by improving psychological well-being, supporting pain management, and promoting greater engagement in therapy, while also encouraging a more holistic, patient-centered approach to clinical practice. Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) have potentially positive influences on physical, mental, social and mind and/or body awareness in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Findings from this and similar studies can be used to develop or tailor a MBI for individuals with SCI. Implementation of MBIs can significantly enhance rehabilitation by improving psychological well-being, supporting pain management, and promoting greater engagement in therapy, while also encouraging a more holistic, patient-centered approach to clinical practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».