Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is pleasing to report another successful year for the Fellowship, albeit with the occasional blip where we were perhaps over-ambitious in our plans: we had to cancel two of our George Eliot Country Tours. We lost a few members, either as a result of age and infirmity or the increase in our subscription rates, but we also gained new ones, and made many new contacts as a result of our activities through the year\nI start with thanks to the Fellowship Council, strengthened at the AGM with new members; I am glad to report that our Council meetings are interesting, lively and full of suggestions for furthering the aims of the Fellowship. New Council members Elaine Peake, Pam Weight and Juliet Hopper are making great contributions and the rest of the Council, Joan Bunn, Jill Bridgewater, May Green, Viv Wood, Susan Healey and I are delighted that our meetings are so productive, and that there is a willingness to try new ideas and ways of reaching new audiences.\nMy second vote of thanks goes to our Vice-Presidents and President, who unfailingly give support and encouragement in all our activities. I know that you would wish me to thank especially John Rignall and Beryl Gray for the marvellous work they do in editing the Review, and to express my gratitude to the Annual Essay Prize panel of judges. Rosemary Ashton, Giles Foster, Kathryn Hughes and Gabriel Woolf have all supported us as speakers in the last year and we are greatly indebted to them that in their busy professional lives they nevertheless find time to travel to Nuneaton and present sparkling performances for our members and guests.\nThe theme for the year was The Mill on the Floss and we arranged a rich variety of Mill-related activities for our members. We are also attracting an increasing number of non-members to our events, and since they pay more than members we are always glad to see them! The George Eliot Weekend in May was well attended and enjoyed by all. The Saturday included four papers, by Dr Marilyn Orr from Laurentian University, Ontario on The Mill on the Floss and the 1860s; Brenda Maddox then described how she researched and produced her latest book on George Eliot, published in 2009; after a buffet lunch at Bedworth Civic Hall we heard from Dr Melissa Raines from the University of Liverpool on 'Strains of Solemn Music' in The Mill on the Floss; and the day ended with a fascinating combination of personal and critical analysis of Middlemarch by Rebecca Mead, a staff writer on The New Yorker.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».