Andrena (Micrandrena) chananaea Pisanty & Wood 2025, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
3.1.2.8.Andrena(Micrandrena)chananaeaPisanty & Wood sp. nov. Figures 7, 18 F, L, 21 A Etymology. Nominative feminine singular form of the Latin adjective chananaeus (= Canaanite). Diagnosis. Within the Andrena minutula species group, the female of A. chananaea is characterized by the combination of a shagreened, strongly punctate clypeus, often with a strong impunctate midline (Fig. 18 F), densely and strongly punctate scutum (Figs 7 C, 18 L), and shagreened tergal discs with at most obscure punctation (Fig. 7 D). These characters apply equally well to A. minutula (Kirby) itself, and we could not identify any good morphological character that separates females of the two taxa. Within the Levantine Micrandrena fauna, the female of A. chananaea most closely resembles A. sillata Warncke and A. alfkenelloides cardalia Warncke. Compared to A. sillata, A. chananaea has stronger and coarser clypeal puncturing (Fig. 18 E, F), and slightly sparser and coarser scutal punctation (Fig. 18 K, L). Compared to A. a. cardalia, it has a more evenly sculptured clypeus (very densely punctate and transversely striated basally, partly smooth medioapically in A. a. cardalia; Figs 16 A, 18 F) and a dull, microreticulate, and very weakly punctate tergal disc 1 (Fig. 7 D; usually smoother and more distinctly punctate in A. a. cardalia, especially in the second generation). The male of A. chananaea is very hard to diagnose among members of the A. minutula group, due to its extreme morphological variability, both among and within the two seasonal generations. The main consistent characters are a short flagellomere 1, clypeus and scutum which are densely punctured and usually at least partly shagreened, terga which are highly variable but at least weakly punctate, and simple genitalia. The male is closest to A. alfkenella Perkins and A. alfkenelloides cardalia, but exhibits subtle differences in the shape of the genitalia, with the gonostyli only slightly narrowed basally (inner margin of gonostylus more strongly narrowing basally in A. alfkenella and A. a. cardalia), and the penis valves distinctly broader basally vs. apically (more uniformly narrow in the comparison species) (Fig. 21 A – C). In general overview, the genitalia of A. chananaea appear somewhat more robust and enlarged. In addition, males of A. chananaea usually possess a longer flagellomere 1 when compared to A. a. cardalia, and tergal discs that are more strongly shagreened and more weakly and finely punctured when compared to both A. alfkenella and A. a. cardalia, but all these traits are far too variable among individuals of these species to constitute reliable differentiating characters. The male of A. chananaea may also resemble A. minutuloides, but its scutal punctation is denser, and its penis valves are narrower basally (Fig. 21 A, F). Description. First generation female. Body length: 5.5–6 mm. — Integumental colour: Body and legs black. Flagellum black, partly covered by greyish scales especially on distal flagellomeres. Tarsi black to brown. Wings weakly infuscate, veins and stigma brown (Fig. 7 A). Tergal marginal zones black, apical margin black to brownish (Fig. 7 D). — Pubescence: Face mostly with light brownish to golden, moderately dense hair, on clypeus semi-erect, short and thin, on paraocular area erect and medium-lengthed, on supraclypeal area and scape erect and short, on frons and preoccipital ridge erect, short to long, on genal area semi-erect to erect, short to medium (Fig. 7 A – C). Few inconspicuous short dark hairs occur on ocellar triangle and behind upper margin of compound eyes. Hair of facial fovea brownish on upper ⅓ of fovea, more whitish below (Fig. 7 B, C). Scutum with brownish hair, centrally short to minute, interspersed with few long erect hairs, underlying cuticle visible, peripherally short to medium and erect. Metanotum and periphery of scutellum with erect, short to long brownish hair (Fig. 7 C). Mesepisternum with long whitish hair (Fig. 7 A). Propodeal corbicula incomplete, posterodorsal fringe composed of long plumose whitish hair, corbicular surface with few long, simple whitish hairs. Leg hair mostly whitish to golden, flocculus incomplete, white, tibial scopal hair simple, whitish, becoming brown near posterobasal margin of tibia (Fig. 7 A). Majority of tergal discs 1–2 essentially hairless, 3–4 with minute inconspicuous bright hair, tergal discs laterally with few sparse short to medium white hairs. Tergal marginal zones 2–4 with prominent, broadly interrupted white hair bands, consisting of very sparse medium-lengthed hairs emerging from the basal rim of the marginal zone, and denser short hairs emerging near its apex. Tergal marginal zone 4 with very weak continuous band of very sparse medium-lengthed whitish hairs emerging from its basal rim. Terminal fringe light brown, flanked by few white hairs (Fig. 7 D). — Head: 1.2 times broader than long. Mandibles bidentate, moderately crossed. Galea finely shagreened (Fig. 7 B). Labral process trapezoidal, not much broader than long. Clypeus domed, entirely shagreened and matt except for an occasionally shinier apical margin, punctation strong, distance between punctures 1–2 puncture diameters, an impunctate midline is usually weakly to strongly developed (Figs 7 B, 18 F). Ventrolateral part of paraocular area very smooth, strongly and densely punctured. Frons and rest of paraocular area strongly longitudinally striated, with coarse punctures embedded between the striations (Fig. 7 B, C). Flagellomere 1 0.9–1 times as long as 2 + 3, 2 slightly shorter than 3 (Fig. 7 B). Facial fovea dorsally moderately narrow, here about 0.4 times as broad as antennocular distance, tapering ventrally, extending from level of lower end of lateral ocellus to slightly above base of clypeus, lower ⅔ separated from compound eye by smooth cuticular strip. Frons with distinct medial carina, dorsally usually ending with a smooth broadened flat area under the medial ocellus. Distance of fovea from lateral ocellus about 2 ocellus diameters (Fig. 7 B, C). Lateral ocelli not connected posteriorly by trough-like furrow. Ocelloccipital distance roughly 1 ocellus diameter. Preoccipital ridge weakly carinate (Fig. 7 C). — Mesosoma: Dorsolateral angle of pronotum not elevated. Scutum usually strongly shagreened and matt, rarely weakly to strongly shiny and partly smooth, punctation strong and dense, distance between punctures <0.5 to 1 puncture diameter. Scutellum similar, anterior part often shiny and somewhat smooth (Figs 7 C, 18 L). Mesepisternum posteriorly finely alveolate, anteriorly gradually strongly and densely, obliquely punctured. Surface of propodeal corbicula reticulated, with few large punctures around hair bases. Posterior part of propodeum strongly differentiated into horizontal vs. vertical parts. Posterolateral area of propodeum rugose-areolate. Propodeal triangle delineated from flanking areas by change in sculpture, not surrounded by carina, horizontal part coarsely radially rugose, vertical part very finely areolated (Fig. 7 C). Hind pretarsal claw with small inner tooth. Recurrent vein 1 meeting submarginal cell 2 more or less at its middle. Nervulus distinctly antefurcal to almost interstitial (Fig. 7 A). — Metasoma: Tergal discs 1–2 strongly shagreened and matt, with hints of fine punctation blended into the shagreening; 3 and especially 4 often more weakly shagreened, 3 with stronger hints of fine, dense punctation. Tergal marginal zones impunctate, weakly depressed, moderately arched, 2–3 centrally occupying 0.4–0.7 of tergal length, 1–2 distinctly shagreened and matt, the following gradually more weakly shagreened (Fig. 7 D). Pygidial plate normally developed. — Second generation female. Body length: 5–6.5 mm. — Integumental colour: As in first generation, but flagellum often brown to reddish-brown anteriorly. — Pubescence: Similar to first generation, but overall somewhat sparser, shorter and brighter, without dark hairs on ocellar triangle and upper margin of compound eye. — Head: Similar to first generation, but impunctate midline of clypeus usually absent or poorly developed. — Mesosoma: As in first generation, but scutum and scutellum nearly always strongly shiny, partly to fully smooth at least on disc. Sculpturing of horizontal part of propodeal triangle slightly finer, more rugose-areolate. — Metasoma: As in first generation. — First generation male. Body length: 5–6 mm. — Integumental colour: Body and legs black. Flagellum black, partly covered by greyish scales especially on distal flagellomeres. Tarsi black to brown. Wings weakly infuscate, veins and stigma brown (Fig. 7 E). Tergal marginal zones black to golden-brown (Fig. 7 H). — Pubescence: Face, including clypeus, supraclypeal and paraocular areas, scape and frons, with moderately dense, semi-erect to erect, medium to long black hair. A few whitish hairs can often be noted near apex of clypeus and on scape, exact colour dependent on angle of view. Preoccipital ridge with long erect whitish to brownish hairs. Dorsal part of genal area with short to medium erect black hairs, ventral part with long erect whitish hairs (Fig. 7 E – G). Scutum, scutellum and metanotum with long erect hairs, mostly whitish to brownish, a few dark, these hairs sparse on scutum, here interspersed with shorter inconspicuous hairs, dense on metanotum and periphery of scutellum. Mesepisternum with very long erect hairs, whitish on ventral part, usually black and rarely whitish on dorsal part (Fig. 7 E, G). Propodeum with long hairs, mostly whitish, some dark hairs often occur near base of wing. Leg hair mostly white, some weak golden reflections appear mostly on tarsi (Fig. 7 E). Base of tergum 1 and lateral areas of all terga with sparse, short to medium white hair; rest of tergal discs with minute inconspicuous whitish hair. Tergal marginal zones 2–3 with weak, broadly interrupted white hair bands, concentrated mostly near apex of marginal zone
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».