Graduate Student Food Insecurity on Campus: A Hidden Hurdle
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Food insecurity is characterized by an uncertainty or inability to acquire sufficient amounts of food needed to meet the dietary requirements of household members, due to a lack of financial resources within the household (Polsy & Garriguet, 2022). Post-secondary students are a particularly vulnerable population, with a disproportionate number reporting having experienced food insecurity during their studies (El-Zein et al., 2019). Such tendencies are concerning as correlations between food insecurity and various adverse outcomes influencing the health and well-being of post-secondary students have consistently been documented in the literature. However, very little is known regarding the specific experiences of graduate students. To this end, this thesis seeks to bridge the gaps in our understanding through a three-phase approach. Phase one of this thesis assessed changes in neighborhood food environment quality pre- and post-pandemic using data from 39 supermarkets located in Ottawa. The findings suggest that food affordability and food quality have decreased post-pandemic with disparities persisting between high and low socioeconomic status neighborhoods in Ottawa. Phase two consisted of a survey of 363 anglophone graduate students attending the University of Ottawa revealing that 48% were food secure, 13.5% of graduate students were marginally food insecure, 19.5% were moderately food insecure, and 18.7% were severely food insecure. Furthermore, food insecure students were more likely to report a negative influence on their academic performance, course load, in-class participation, attendance, and sense of belongingness to graduate studies community. Finally, phase three made use of semi-structured interview with 14 food insecure graduate students which revealed four key themes namely 1) Graduate students understood food insecurity as a lack of proximity, affordability, quality, and time; 2) Food insecure students experienced adverse physical and mental health outcomes, lower socialization, and academic outcomes; 3) Institutional factors hindered help-seeking behaviours; and 4) Food insecure advocated for holistic programs on campus to mitigate food insecurity. Together, the findings of the thesis provide insights into the experience of food insecurity amongst graduate students which may be used to adapt policies and approaches used by universities in better supporting students.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».