MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7105995337 · doi:10.7939/83397

Access to Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare: The Experiences of International Muslim Female Students at the University of Alberta

2025· dissertation· en· W7105995337 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration and Labor Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFocus groupReproductive healthHealth careSexual and reproductive health and rightsQualitative researchIntersectionalityReproductive medicineQuality (philosophy)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Annually, a significant number of international students from diverse countries enroll at the University of Alberta for undergraduate and graduate-level studies. Notably, the enrollment of Muslim international students has been on the rise in recent years. Among this population, female students constitute a substantial portion. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding their experiences accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in Alberta. Despite the Canadian healthcare system ensuring equal access to reproductive healthcare for all women, certain disparities persist for various groups. Understanding the factors influencing international Muslim female students’ access to SRH services is crucial for ensuring their well-being and enhancing their quality of life, particularly for newcomers. By adopting an intersectional feminist theoretical framework, I explored the multifaceted experiences of international Muslim female students at the University of Alberta in accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. This study investigates the complex interplay of identities—specifically gender, religion, and international student status—and how these intersecting aspects influence these students’ interactions with SRH services. As international students, these women navigate unique challenges that often intersect with their cultural and religious backgrounds, leading to distinct healthcare needs and barriers that existing healthcare systems in Canada inadequately address. As a qualitative study, I conducted in-depth interviews with participants to gain a nuanced understanding of their experiences and perceptions regarding SRH services. The recruitment process resulted in a cohort of 20 participants, consisting of 14 individuals for individual interviews and six for focus group interviews. I hosted the focus group discussion. Recruitment efforts targeted international Muslim female students from various academic programs and backgrounds to ensure a diverse sample that could represent a range of perspectives. Ethical considerations were carefully addressed, with measures taken to ensure confidentiality and to protect the anonymity of participants, given the sensitive nature of SRH topics. Thematic analysis was employed to identify and interpret recurring themes across the interviews. This approach involved systematically coding the data, followed by grouping codes into broader themes that reflected participants' experiences and challenges in accessing SRH services. The interviews offered insight into how religious beliefs, cultural stigmas, and concerns about confidentiality affect students' willingness and comfort in accessing SRH services. Participants expressed a variety of concerns related to SRH, ranging from reproductive autonomy and privacy to the perceived lack of culturally sensitive resources in campus and community healthcare settings. Furthermore, participants pointed out language barriers and voiced concerns about the Canadian healthcare system and its limitations. In this thesis, I argue that the Canadian healthcare model inadequately addresses the intersectional needs of international Muslim women. This gap not only impacts healthcare accessibility but also contributes to students’ overall sense of isolation and challenges in navigating a foreign healthcare environment that does not meet their expectations or understanding of SRH. The implications of this research are twofold. First, it underscores the importance of developing SRH services that are both accessible and inclusive, emphasizing that healthcare providers should be trained to recognize and accommodate the diverse backgrounds of international students. This includes integrating culturally appropriate practices, improving language accessibility, and ensuring that healthcare spaces foster a sense of trust and respect for Muslim female students. Second, the study advocates for policy changes at the institutional level, encouraging universities to adopt a more intersectional approach to student health services, particularly those related to SRH. By doing so, universities can better support the well-being and academic success of their diverse student populations. In conclusion, this research contributes to the growing body of literature on intersectionality in healthcare access and demonstrates the need for a more inclusive, culturally sensitive approach for international Muslim female students in Canada. By addressing the specific barriers they face, this study provides insights that could lead to the development of SRH services that genuinely respect and respond to the diverse needs of students, fostering a supportive environment that aligns with Canada’s commitment to multiculturalism and inclusivity.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,430
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,855

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,009
Communication savante0,0050,001
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetMigration and Labor DynamicsTravaux en français237 207