MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7105999472 · doi:10.7939/83188

Periodontal Status and Risk Factors of a Vulnerable Low-Income Community in Edmonton

2025· dissertation· en· W7105999472 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineDentistry
ThématiqueOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMissing dataImputation (statistics)CohortCollinearityLasso (programming language)Socioeconomic statusTooth lossPopulationPeriodontal diseaseConfounding

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Periodontal disease is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide and a leading cause of tooth loss. It is strongly influenced by modifiable risk factors including smoking, substance use, and social determinants of health such as income, education, and access to care. While previous studies have established this link globally, Canadian data remains sparse, particularly regarding vulnerable inner-city populations. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap by assessing the periodontal health of individuals in Edmonton’s Boyle McCauley Street community, a population characterized by socioeconomic vulnerability. Methods: This was a population-based, cross-sectional study involving 322 adults recruited from four community organizations serving vulnerable Edmontonians. Data was collected via structured questionnaires and clinical oral examinations. Descriptive statistics showcased the population’s socio-demographic, behavioral, as well as general and oral health parameters. Given the dataset’s complexity, additional statistical methods were employed to identify factors associated with periodontal status, as defined by average probing depth and average interproximal probing depths of the six index Ramfjord teeth. To manage missing data and reduce modeling bias, multiple imputation using the Predictive Mean Matching (PMM) was performed. Variable filtering and collinearity checks were conducted to reduce dimensionality, followed by variable selection using LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression via the HierNet algorithm. Separate models were constructed for total average probing depth and interproximal depth to account for site-specific periodontal involvement. Final variable selection used backward elimination with pooled estimates from the multiple imputations. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 49 years, was predominantly male (71%), and overwhelmingly unemployed (89%), with only 24% earning over $12,000 annually. High-risk behaviors were widespread: 69% smoked, 53% consumed alcohol regularly, and 56% used recreational drugs. Only 36% had seen a dentist in the past year, and 9% were fully edentulous. Mucosal inflammation and soft tissue lesions were identified in over half of the participants, and the average DMFT (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth) index was 13.3, indicating a high caries experience. Multivariate regression identified several statistically significant associations with increased periodontal probing depths. First, individuals presenting with pink or white mucosal lesions demonstrated significantly altered probing depths suggesting a potential link between periodontal inflammation and mucosal pathology. Second, participants who reported esthetic or functional oral limitations (e.g., impaired speech or appearance concerns) had worse periodontal outcomes, indicating that subjective perceptions may correlate with underlying disease. Third, individuals self-identifying as “Other” ethnicity (non-White, non-Indigenous) showed slightly but significantly higher probing depths than other ethnic groups, suggesting potential racial variations in periodontal health. Contrary to expectations, no statistically significant associations were observed with traditionally recognized risk factors such as smoking status, income, or education. This is likely attributable to the cohort’s overall homogeneity in low socioeconomic status and high-risk behaviors, which may have limited variability and statistical contrast. Conclusion: This study provided a detailed snapshot of the periodontal and oral health landscape within one of Edmonton’s most underserved communities. It highlights the overwhelming burden of disease and unmet need in a population where access to care is severely limited and risk factors are widespread. The results emphasize the importance of integrating oral health with broader community health initiatives, particularly in vulnerable communities. From a research perspective, the study demonstrates the utility of advanced modeling strategies including multiple imputation, dimensionality reduction, and penalized regression in maximizing the value of complex, imperfect real-world datasets. Clinically, it suggests that patient-reported oral health concerns and visible mucosal changes may potentially serve as screening indicators for periodontal disease in resource-limited settings. Future studies should explore these associations in more diverse and representative populations, and ideally adopt longitudinal designs to examine causality and disease progression. The implementation of programs like the Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP) provides a unique opportunity to revisit these communities in future years and assess the impact of expanded public dental coverage on periodontal outcomes. In sum, this research contributes critical insight to the Canadian literature on oral health equity and offers a foundation for targeted interventions in high-risk populations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,188
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,379

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetOral microbiology and periodontitis researchTravaux en français237 207