MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7106007852 · doi:10.7939/83228

Advancing Environmental Sustainability at Canadian Festivals

2025· dissertation· en· W7106007852 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSustainabilityVariety (cybernetics)Environmental communicationEnvironmental educationPosition (finance)Psychological interventionSustainable development

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Study 1: A Scoping Review of Environmental Communication at Festivals Environmental communication, a sub-category of sustainability communication, has been increasingly adopted in festival settings to promote pro-environmental behaviors among stakeholders, shape a green image, and enhance an organization’s reputation. This study reviewed 37 articles published in English to identify dominant trends in this area of research. This scoping review revealed that music festivals have received the most research attention compared to other types of festivals. Attendees are often considered as the primary audience for environmental communication, with their perspectives and responses being the most frequently documented. Festivals serve as an educational platform for communicating a variety of environmental topics, with waste management and climate change receiving comparatively more attention. While some studies have explored the effectiveness of different message frames on attendees’ pro-environmental intentions, this area remains under-researched. Future studies are encouraged to test a broader range of theory-informed environmental communication interventions to advance the field further. Study 2: Understanding How Canadian Festivals Address Environmental Sustainability through the Lens of the UN SDGs This study explored how Canadian festivals have aligned with and incorporated the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in their festival management through a multiple case study research design. All festivals included in this research demonstrated a wide range of commitments to environmental sustainability. While two festivals have voluntarily aligned with the SDGs to position themselves within a broader global discourse, most did not perceive this adoption as an urgent priority. Common challenges to this adoption included limited organizational capacity, the lack of practical value of the SDGs, minimal pressure from external stakeholders, and insufficient resource support in terms of budget and education resources. Importantly, engagement with the SDGs was not driven by external requirements, but more by intrinsic motivations and perceived relevance to their stakeholders. This study contributes to the growing literature on environmental sustainability in festival management by presenting the challenges involved in localizing global frameworks like the SDGs within local festival contexts. Study 3: Canadian Festivals’ Commitment to Environmental Sustainability: A Volunteer Perspective As a key internal stakeholder group, volunteers play an important but underexplored role in advancing environmental sustainability at festivals in Canada. This study drew on survey responses from volunteers and interviews with volunteer managers of three festivals. By applying Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) framework, this study investigated how volunteers perceive their festival’s organizational culture around environmental sustainability and how these perceptions related to their intention to return. Overall, volunteers showed a strong willingness to return. Their perceptions of a festival’s environmental commitment were weakly but significantly associated with their retention. This study also examined volunteers’ on-site pro-environmental behaviours, both private-sphere (e.g., recycling, using public transportation) and social-environmental (e.g., peer advocacy), and the types of organizational support that encouraged these behaviours. Findings highlighted the importance of infrastructures in supporting private-sphere pro-environmental behaviours, while social-environmental behaviours are more strongly influenced by perceived organizational culture, organizational support, leadership, and peer involvement. Overall, this study extended workplace environmental psychology to festival settings, which highlighted opportunities to include sustainability more deeply into volunteer experiences and volunteer management practices. For example, one important approach is to provide clear communication about the festival’s environmental initiatives across all volunteer groups, facilitated by staff and peer volunteers.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,076
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,550

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,021
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0100,015
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,003
Communication savante0,0080,003
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetSport and Mega-Event ImpactsTravaux en français237 207