From the Outdoor Rink to Development Inc.: Parent, Coach, and Director Navigation of Player Development in the Prolympic Field of Independent Youth Hockey
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation examines how prolympic pressures influence the experience of parents, coaches, and directors in the field of independent youth hockey in Alberta. Formed from seeds of dissatisfaction with traditional minor hockey environments, independent youth hockey was created so youth hockey players could pursue competitive goals with greater intensity. Increased professionalization and commercialization contributed to the alignment of independent youth hockey with the concept of prolympism (Donnelly, 1996). Despite a growing body of research on the commercialization of youth sport, little attention has been paid to prolympism or to the rise of independent hockey in Canada and how its organizational, cultural, and economic logics reshape the lived experiences of key stakeholders. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how prolympic pressures (Ingham et al., 2002) are embedded within, and reproduced through, independent hockey in Alberta. Guided by a critical orientation, the primary research question was: How do parents, coaches, and directors navigate and negotiate their participation in a prolympic field of hockey player development? To address this question, the study draws on Bourdieu’s sociological concepts of field, doxa, habitus, and capital, along with Lareau’s (2002) ‘concerted cultivation’ and Brown’s (2015) description of ‘homo economicus,’ to critically interrogate how prolympic structural and cultural forces shape the pursuit of development for major stakeholders in Alberta youth hockey. A qualitative design was employed, including semi-structured interviews with eleven directors, six coaches, and twelve parents, as well as practice and game observations of teams competing in independent youth hockey leagues in Alberta. This design enabled a comprehensive exploration of how dominant values, beliefs, and practices sustain prolympic ideals of elite performance, heightened competition, and widespread commercialization in independent youth hockey. The analysis highlights the tensions between parental aspirations, coaching practices, organizational priorities, and the prolympic qualities that continue to reproduce inequities in youth sport. Findings reveal how prolympic ideals are generally accepted as stakeholders pursue intense competitive goals (Hughes & Coakley, 1991) in the field of independent youth hockey. Parents were required to navigate tensions between fostering their children’s enjoyment of the game and tolerating the increasing demands of performance-oriented development pathways. Coaches described competitiveness, freedom, and choice as benefits of independent youth hockey, but these neoliberal elite-oriented values often constrained their ability to focus on developmental goals. Directors highlighted the value and efficiency of their programming, acknowledging the expectations of competitive stakeholders and offering few solutions to balance goals of inclusive participation. This study makes two major theoretical contributions. First, it extends Bourdieu’s framework of field, doxa, habitus, and capital by demonstrating how these concepts operate within the emerging and underexplored context of independent youth hockey. Second, it advances understanding of how stakeholders navigate the prolympic field by extending Lareau’s concept of concerted cultivation and applying Brown’s framing of homo economicus to show how directors adopt practices that position youth athletes within this prolympic system. Empirically, this research offers one of the first sociological examinations of independent hockey in Canada, documenting how commercialization, competition, and elite-oriented values become normalized by stakeholders. Practically, it highlights the structural and cultural mechanisms that reinforce barriers to equitable participation in youth sport, providing evidence for policymakers, sport organizations, and educators who seek to design more inclusive models of development. In sum, this dissertation addresses a significant gap in the sociology of youth sport by providing an empirically rich, theoretically-grounded analysis of independent youth hockey in Alberta. It demonstrates how social, cultural, and economic forces intersect to enable opportunities and reproduce barriers, offering important implications for theory, practice, and policy in Canadian sport.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».