MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7106027117 · doi:10.7939/83020

Pursuit of Permanent Status and Career Choices for International Students in Canada

2025· dissertation· en· W7106027117 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration and Labor Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmigrationAffect (linguistics)Work (physics)Career PathwaysFace (sociological concept)Temporary workImmigration lawControl (management)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

International students constitute an important part of Canada’s population, and a large portion of international students intend to settle permanently in Canada after graduation. The post-graduation work permit program (PGWPP) is a major potential pathway for international students to achieve that goal. Regarding the situation of post-graduation work permit (PGWP) holders in Canada’s labour market, although there is extensive literature about how temporary immigrant status affects an individual’s career outcome, it is unclear how pursuing permanent status will affect an immigrant’s career and life. My thesis is centered on this puzzle. Building on existing research on immigrant insecure legal status and school-to-work transitions, drawing on theories of precarious work, my current study aims to answer the following research questions: How does the pursuit of permanent legal status affect international student graduates’ career plans and trajectories? Furthermore, how does the pursuit of permanent status affect other aspects of immigrant lives? To collect empirical data, I conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 17 international student graduates from Canadian universities who had experiences using PGWP to work in Canada and intended to gain permanent legal status. I coded my interview data thematically, informed by data analysis methods including abductive analysis and flexible coding. My findings reveal that PGWP holders frequently engage in trade-offs to strategically prioritize their immigration goals. These trade-offs involve but are not limited to career decisions, education plans, and taking on more uncertainties regarding their future. PGWP holders face obstacles at various stages of their labour market experiences due to the temporary nature of their status: they are more disadvantaged when seeking jobs, they are at risk of potential exploitation from employers, and they encounter increased difficulty when attempting to switch jobs. Meanwhile, career trade-offs aiming at pursuing permanence often effectively reinforce existing labour market inequalities faced by temporary immigrants, because individuals tend to accept or remain in unsatisfactory jobs as part of those trade-offs. When looking at aspects of immigrant lives other than career, I find that PGWP holders face a lack of institutional support and sufficient information as they navigate their own status and when they go through the process of applying for permanent residency. They are often placed in precarious situations when unexpected policy changes occur. My research has yielded valuable insight into international students’ experiences with the PGWPP. Although the PGWPP does not directly contribute to people’s immigration intention, it greatly enables the formation of the latter. Many of my study participants said that they did not plan to immigrate when they first arrived in Canada, but the availability of the PGWP encouraged them to remain longer in Canada, and the time they spent studying and working in Canada often led to their subsequent immigration intention. However, the prospect of having an open work permit for up to three years does not always play out as ideally as hoped, and the PGWP policy does not give international student graduates a direct and smooth pathway to gaining permanence in Canada. People face challenges in the labour market due to their temporary status as PGWP holders, making it difficult to fully convert the time granted by the PGWP into satisfactory Canadian work experience that builds towards their immigration goal.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,284

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,004
Communication savante0,0050,001
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetMigration and Labor DynamicsTravaux en français237 207