MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7106031921 · doi:10.7939/83343

Digital Literacy Practices and Learning at Home for Children of First Generation Newcomers in Canada

2025· dissertation· en· W7106031921 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiteracy, Media, and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDigital literacyContext (archaeology)LiteracyFocus groupQualitative researchSituatedInformation literacyCritical literacySocial practice

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Contemporary childhood exists in a rapidly changing literacy context in the digital age, where digital devices and technology are increasingly used at home and in school. This qualitative study explored newcomer children’s digital practices, as reported by their parents, and parents’ perspectives of their children’s digital usage at home. The COVID-19 pandemic and shifts to online remote learning have also impacted children’s digital literacy practices, and this study also provides understanding of culturally and linguistically diverse children’s digital literacy practices at home during this pandemic era. Theoretically, this research is framed by contemporary literacy studies, specifically, multiliteracies and new literacy studies, which understand literacy as everyday multimodal and multilingual social practices, across multimedia. I drew on Kress’s (1997, 2005) concept of multimodality in the digital context and Green’s (1988, 2012) three-dimensional literacy model as my conceptual frameworks to help me understand and interpret my data on children’s digital practices and how parents understand their children’s digital literacy practices at home. My study is a qualitative case study using ethnographically informed approaches and small stories to present the findings. The data collection tools I used were an online survey and semistructured interviews with first-generation newcomer parents to answer my research questions. I received 39 responses to the online survey and interviewed 4 first-generation newcomer parents. In this dissertation, I focus on the interview data with 3 of the newcomer parents. The findings indicate that the three children’s digital practices at home are situated in a contemporary context where digital devices and digital environments are essential for their social networking, family relationship building, learning, entertainment, creation activities, and recording life moments through photos and videos. My research shows that children are not only consumers of digital texts but also active producers. The three children have been exposed to social media influencers, particularly on the YouTube platform. Today, children are not always the only literacy learners at home and the parents are not always the literacy knowledge holders, as was typical in literacy environments historically. Instead, within the digital multimodal literacy context, children may know more than their parents and assist their parents’ technology usage at home. In terms of parents’ perspectives towards their children’s digital practices at home, the three participating parents tended to focus on their children’s operational skills with digital devices in the interviews and sometimes provided examples of how their children engaged in digital activities by following conventions and rules. However, the three parents did not share much about how their children use critical thinking and analysis in their digital practices. In addition, the parents described the difficulties of balancing their children’s digital usage at home in this contemporary era. The insights gained from my study have the potential to provide valuable information for newcomer parents, educators, and policymakers to understand newcomer children’s home digital literacy experiences. As well, this information may ease the anxieties of newcomer parents about parental management of digital practices and digital literacy. Educators and policymakers will be able to use this study to recognize the ways that newcomer children use digital tools in their homes as they consider curriculum, pedagogy, and policy for newcomer children.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,044
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,321

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,003
Communication savante0,0040,001
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,189
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetLiteracy, Media, and EducationTravaux en français237 207