MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7106311173 · doi:10.5284/1138161

An Enhanced Archaeological Buildings Appraisal, 151 Arundel Street, Sheffield

2009· article· en· W7106311173 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchaeology Data Service · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRedevelopmentSituatedQuarter (Canadian coin)BoroughSketchExcavation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In July 2009, ARCUS were commissioned by Cartwright Pickard Architects, on behalf of City Estates, to undertake an archaeological buildings appraisal on a site at 151 Arundel Street (SK 3552 8684) located within the Cultural Industries Quarter Conservation Area. The appraisal was required to inform a planning application for mixed-use redevelopment at the site. The appraisal comprised a site visit, with digital photography and sketch plans, as well as documentary and cartographic research. The site comprises three plots: one bounded by Arundel Street and Brown Lane, and two fronting Arundel Lane, presently delineated by a change in ground level. The only standing buildings are situated within the former plot. These include three ranges of the former Sellers Wheel. The remaining buildings are all Grade II listed and form part of a once medium sized integrated works which originally included grinding hulls, forges, a steam engine, workshops, offices and warehouse. The remaining structures are the principal northwest range, the northeast range and part of the southwest range. These housed offices and warehousing, grinding and workshops respectively. Those structures which formed the rear and south corner of the works have been demolished, along with those positioned at the southeast of the site, originally within the adjacent plot fronting Arundel Lane and Brown Lane. The standing buildings on the site retain a large amount of historical fabric which relate to the buildings former use as part of the Sellers Wheel cutlery works. This includes evidence of grinding trough with jack-arched ceiling, powered workshops with indications of former positioning of workbenches, little mesters workshops, high status offices with related features and warehouse spaces and possible early steam engine house within the ground floor of the northeast range. The land to the rear of buildings has been cleared. Evaluation and excavation at adjacent sites has indicated that there is a moderate to high potential for the survival of sub-surface remains. These are most likely to be related to late 18th-/early 19th- century back-to-back houses along Arundel Lane which were later converted to workshops. The remains could include basements, floor and yard surfaces, outbuildings privies and workshops. At the rear of the yard of 151 Arundel Street, the basement and associated features relating to a steam engine, depicted on the 1896 Goad plan, may survive below ground. The potential for medieval or earlier archaeology within the site is low. Although a high proportion of the original buildings have been demolished, reducing the integrity of the works, the remaining standing buildings are grade II listed, contain evidence of former usage and continue to preserve the character of the conservation area. Similar sites located within the area have undergone a programme of further archaeological recording prior to redevelopment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,791
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,354
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchaeology Data ServiceMême sujetHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesTravaux en français237 207